PUBLICATIONS / PUBLICATII - NAGOYA
1)
[Anonymous], 2014. Nagoya Protocol takes effect-without Japan,
NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 32: 1176−1176. DOI: 10.1038/nbt1214-1176c.
WOS:000346156800008
2) Adebola, T,
2019. Examining plant variety protection in Nigeria: Realities,
obligations and prospects, JOURNAL OF
WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, 22: 36−58. DOI: 10.1111/jwip.12113.
WOS:000460938200003
3) Adebola, T,
2019. Access and benefit sharing, farmers' rights and plant breeders'
rights: reflections on the African Model Law,
QUEEN MARY JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY, 9: 105−121. DOI: 10.4337/qmjip.2019.01.06. WOS:000457492800007
4) Aerts, R;
Geeraert, L; Berecha, G; Hundera, K; Muys, B; De Kort, H; Honnay, O, 2017.
Conserving wild Arabica coffee: Emerging threats and opportunities,
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 237: 75−79. DOI:
10.1016/j.agee.2016.12.023. WOS:000393252200008
5) Albert, H,
2014. Biodiversity Europe will implement the Nagoya Protocol,
BIOFUTUR, : 21−21. WOS:000338900900047
6) Ameha, A;
Nielsen, OJ; Larsen, HO, 2014. Impacts of access and benefit sharing on
livelihoods and forest: Case of participatory forest management in Ethiopia,
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 97:
162−171. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.11.011. WOS:000331480200018
7) Amengual,
J; Alvarez-Berastegui, D, 2018. A critical evaluation of the Aichi
Biodiversity Target 11 and the Mediterranean MPA network, two years ahead of
its deadline, BIOLOGICAL
CONSERVATION, 225: 187−196. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.06.032.
WOS:000442003900019
8)
Andriantahina, F; Liu, XL; Feng, TT; Xiang, JH, 2013. Current Status of
Genetics and Genomics of Reared Penaeid Shrimp: Information Relevant to
Access and Benefit Sharing, MARINE
BIOTECHNOLOGY, 15: 399−412. DOI: 10.1007/s10126-013-9500-9.
WOS:000321101800002
9) Angerer, K,
2011. Frog tales−on poison dart frogs, epibatidine, and the sharing of
biodiversity, INNOVATION-THE EUROPEAN
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH, 24: 353−369. DOI:
10.1080/13511610.2011.592061. WOS:000299230500009
10) Antofie,
MM; Sand Sava, C, 2018. BEST PRACTICES IN THE EUROPEAN COUNTRIES FOR
COMPLYING THE NAGOYA PROTOCOL,
SCIENTIFIC PAPERS-SERIES MANAGEMENT ECONOMIC ENGINEERING IN AGRICULTURE AND
RURAL DEVELOPMENT, 18: 23−31. WOS:000454318300003
11) Appleby,
T; Kinsey, S; Wheeler, B; Cunningham, E, 2016. The marine biology of law
and human health, JOURNAL OF THE
MARINE BIOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED KINGDOM, 96: 19−27. DOI:
10.1017/S0025315415000909. WOS:000371158300004
12) Arjjumend,
H, 2018. RECOGNITION OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES IN ACCESS AND BENEFIT SHARING
(ABS) LEGISLATION AND POLICIES OF THE PARTIES TO THE NAGOYA PROTOCOL,
BRICS LAW JOURNAL, 5: 86−113.
DOI: 10.21684/2412-2343-2018-5-3-86-113. WOS:000447243200004
13) Atsali,
SS, 2004. Discussion paper−International regime on access and
benefit-sharing (ABS): Exploring new options for achieving CBD-related ABS
objectives, International Expert
Workshop on Access to Genetic Resources and Benefit Sharing, Record of
Discussion, : 121−124. WOS:000243638100013
14) Austin,
BJ; Robinson, CJ; Tofa, M; Garnett, ST, 2019. Investor aspirations for
Indigenous land and sea management in Australia,
AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL
MANAGEMENT, 26: 156−172. DOI: 10.1080/14486563.2019.1579002.
WOS:000474684300005
15)
Aviles-Polanco, G; Jefferson, DJ; Almendarez-Hernandez, MA; Beltran-Morales,
LF, 2019. Factors That Explain the Utilization of the Nagoya Protocol
Framework for Access and Benefit Sharing,
SUSTAINABILITY, 11: −. DOI:
10.3390/su11205550. WOS:000498398900007
16) Bambridge,
T; Le Meur, PY, 2018. LOCAL KNOWLEDGE AND BIODIVERSITY IN THE MARQUESAS
ISLANDS: GIFT, POWER AND LOSS, REVUE
D ANTHROPOLOGIE DES CONNAISSANCES, 12: 29−55. DOI: 10.3917/rac.038.0029.
WOS:000432305600002
17) Barpujari,
I; Sarma, UK, 2017. Traditional Knowledge in the Time of Neo-Liberalism:
Access and Benefit-Sharing Regimes in India and Bhutan,
INTERNATIONAL INDIGENOUS POLICY JOURNAL, 8: −. DOI:
10.18584/iipj.2017.8.1.3. WOS:000396720900005
18) Barratt,
BIP; Mason, PG; Cock, MJW; Klapwijk, J; Van Lenteren, JC; Brodeur, J;
Hoelmer, KA; Heimpel, GE, 2017. Access and Benefit Sharing: Best
Practices for the Use and Exchange of Invertebrate Biological Control
Agents, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 5TH
INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF ARTHROPODS, : 71−74.
WOS:000461868100021
19) Barratt,
BIP; Moran, VC; Bigler, F; van Lenteren, JC, 2018. The status of
biological control and recommendations for improving uptake for the future,
BIOCONTROL, 63: 155−167. DOI: 10.1007/s10526-017-9831-y.
WOS:000422647200012
20) Bartels,
P; Kotze, A, 2006. Wildlife biomaterial banking in Africa for now and
the future, JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL
MONITORING, 8: 779−781. DOI: 10.1039/b602809h. WOS:000239640000002
21) Bartley,
DM; Nguyen, TTT; Halwart, M; De Silva, SS, 2009. Use and exchange of
aquatic genetic resources in aquaculture: information relevant to access and
benefit sharing, REVIEWS IN
AQUACULTURE, 1: 157−162. DOI: 10.1111/j.1753-5131.2009.01009.x.
WOS:000284763400001
22) Bavikatte,
KS; Bennett, T, 2015. Community stewardship: the foundation of
biocultural rights, JOURNAL OF HUMAN
RIGHTS AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 6: 7−29. DOI: 10.4337/jhre.2015.01.01.
WOS:000442822100002
23) Beck, E,
2019. Access and benefit sharing-The perspective of basic research,
PHYTOMEDICINE, 53: 302−307. DOI: 10.1016/j.phymed.2018.10.018.
WOS:000459935700033
24) Becker, P;
Bosschaerts, M; Chaerle, P; Daniel, HM; Hellemans, A; Olbrechts, A; Rigouts,
L; Wilmotte, A; Hendrickx, M, 2019. Public Microbial Resource Centers:
Key Hubs for Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable (FAIR)
Microorganisms and Genetic Materials,
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 85: −. DOI:
10.1128/AEM.01444-19. WOS:000490946700016
25) Bhatia, P;
Chugh, A, 2015. Role of marine bioprospecting contracts in developing
access and benefit sharing mechanism for marine traditional knowledge
holders in the pharmaceutical, GLOBAL
ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 3: 176−187. DOI: 10.1016/j.gecco.2014.11.015.
WOS:000416220000016
26) Bigler, F,
2010. Does the convention on biological diversity impede biological
control?, AGRARFORSCHUNG SCHWEIZ, 1:
134−141. WOS:000278044000003
27) Birhanu,
FM, 2010. Challenges and prospects of implementing the access and
benefit sharing regime of the Convention on Biological Diversity in Africa:
the case of Ethiopia, INTERNATIONAL
ENVIRONMENTAL AGREEMENTS-POLITICS LAW AND ECONOMICS, 10: 249−266. DOI:
10.1007/s10784-010-9122-x. WOS:000280795600005
28) Blackburn,
HD; Plante, Y; Rohrer, G; Welch, EW; Paiva, SR, 2014. Impact of genetic
drift on access and benefit sharing under the Nagoya Protocol: The case of
the Meishan pig, JOURNAL OF ANIMAL
SCIENCE, 92: 1405−1411. DOI: 10.2527/jas.2013-7274. WOS:000333581900014
29) Blackmore,
A, 2017. Selective breeding and the intensive management of wildlife: a
legal challenge for Namibian conservation,
AFRICAN JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE RESEARCH,
47: 65−78. DOI: 10.3957/056.047.0065. WOS:000422940000001
30) Blasiak,
R; Jouffray, JB; Wabnitz, CCC; Sundstrom, E; Osterblom, H, 2018.
Corporate control and global governance of marine genetic resources,
SCIENCE ADVANCES, 4: −. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aar5237.
WOS:000443175500029
31) Bodeker,
G; van’t Klooster, C; Weisbord, E, 2014. Prunus africana (Hook.f.)
Kalkman: The Overexploitation of a Medicinal Plant Species and Its Legal
Context, JOURNAL OF ALTERNATIVE AND
COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE, 20: 810−822. DOI: 10.1089/acm.2013.0459.
WOS:000345684500002
32) Bohm, M;
Collen, B, 2015. Toward equality of biodiversity knowledge through
technology transfer, CONSERVATION
BIOLOGY, 29: 1290−1302. DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12529. WOS:000363729100005
33) Bonsch, A,
2017. The Nagoya Protocol consequences for plant breeding,
ZWEITES SYMPOSIUM ZIERPFLANZENZUCHTUNG, 2017, 457: 32−35. DOI:
10.5073/jka.457.2017.005. WOS:000414274800004
34) Bose, M;
Dutta, A, 2015. Inequity in hospitalization care: a study on utilization
of healthcare services in West Bengal, India,
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH
POLICY AND MANAGEMENT-IJHPM, 4: 29−38. DOI: 10.15171/ijhpm.2015.05.
WOS:000378652500005
35)
Boundy-Mills, KL; Glantschnig, E; Roberts, IN; Yurkov, A; Casaregola, S;
Daniel, HM; Groenewald, M; Turchetti, B, 2016. Yeast culture collections
in the twenty-first century: new opportunities and challenges,
YEAST, 33: 243−260. DOI:
10.1002/yea.3171. WOS:000380255000002
36) Bourdy, G;
Aubertin, C; Jullian, V; Deharo, E, 2017. Quassia "biopiracy" case and
the Nagoya Protocol: A researcher's perspective,
JOURNAL OF ETHNOPHARMACOLOGY, 206: 290−297. DOI:
10.1016/j.jep.2017.05.030. WOS:000406564500029
37) Bretting,
PK, 2007. The US national Plant Germplasm System in an era of shifting
international norms for germplasm exchange,
PROCEEDINGS OF THE SECOND
INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON PLANT GENETIC RESOURCES OF HORTICULTURAL CROPS,
VOLS 1 AND 2, : 55−. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2007.760.5.
WOS:000252298000005
38) Brink, M;
van Hintum, T, 2020. Genebank Operation in the Arena of Access and
Benefit-Sharing Policies, FRONTIERS
IN PLANT SCIENCE, 10: −. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01712.
WOS:000511378500001
39) Broggiato,
A; Arnaud-Haond, S; Chiarolla, C; Greiber, T, 2014. Fair and equitable
sharing of benefits from the utilization of marine genetic resources in
areas beyond national jurisdiction: Bridging the gaps between science and
policy, MARINE POLICY, 49:
176−185. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2014.02.012. WOS:000338607800022
40) Brush, SB,
2007. Farmers' Rights and protection of traditional agricultural
knowledge, WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 35:
1499−1514. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2006.05.018. WOS:000250023700003
41) Burton, G;
Evans-Illidge, EA, 2014. Emerging R and D Law: The Nagoya Protocol and
Its Implications for Researchers, ACS
CHEMICAL BIOLOGY, 9: 588−591. DOI: 10.1021/cb500045t.
WOS:000333477300002
42) Burton, J,
2012. ACCESS AND BENEFIT SHARING: Policy and Legal Implications for
Papua New Guinea, PACIFIC AFFAIRS, 85:
874−875. WOS:000311765200046
43) Burton, G,
2013. Implementation of the Nagoya Protocol in Juscanz Countries: The
Unlikely Lot, 2010 NAGOYA PROTOCOL ON
ACCESS AND BENEFIT-SHARING IN PERSPECTIVE: IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERNATIONAL
LAW AND IMPLEMENTATION CHALLENGES, 1: 295−329. WOS:000338877200011
44) Buyx, AM;
Tait, J, 2011. Biofuels: ethics and policy-making,
BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS &
BIOREFINING-BIOFPR, 5: 631−639. DOI: 10.1002/bbb.325.
WOS:000297013500014
45)
Camara-Leret, R; Paniagua-Zambrana, N; Svenning, JC; Balslev, H; Macia, MJ,
2014. Geospatial patterns in traditional knowledge serve in assessing
intellectual property rights and benefit-sharing in northwest South America,
JOURNAL OF ETHNOPHARMACOLOGY, 158: 58−65. DOI:
10.1016/j.jep.2014.10.009. WOS:000348084600008
46) Candeira,
AL; Silvestri, L, 2013. Chapter 9. Challenges in the Implementation of
the Nagoya Protocol from the Perspective of a Member State of the European
Union: The Case of Spain, 2010 NAGOYA
PROTOCOL ON ACCESS AND BENEFIT-SHARING IN PERSPECTIVE: IMPLICATIONS FOR
INTERNATIONAL LAW AND IMPLEMENTATION CHALLENGES, 1: 269−294.
WOS:000338877200010
47)
Cardellino, RA; Boyazoglu, J, 2009. Research opportunities in the field
of animal genetic resources,
LIVESTOCK SCIENCE, 120: 166−173. DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2008.07.002.
WOS:000263322600002
48) Chiarolla,
C, 2013. The Role of Private International Law under the Nagoya
Protocol, 2010 NAGOYA PROTOCOL ON
ACCESS AND BENEFIT-SHARING IN PERSPECTIVE: IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERNATIONAL
LAW AND IMPLEMENTATION CHALLENGES, 1: 423−449. WOS:000338877200015
49) Chiarolla,
C, 2014. Intellectual property rights and benefit sharing from marine
genetic resources in areas beyond national jurisdiction: current discussions
and regulatory options, QUEEN MARY
JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, 4: 171−194. DOI:
10.4337/qmjip.2014.03.01. WOS:000340347900002
50) Chiarolla,
C; Louafi, S; Schloen, M, 2013. Chapter 3. An Analysis of the
Relationship between the Nagoya Protocol and Instruments related to Genetic
Resources for Food and Agriculture and Farmers' Rights,
2010 NAGOYA PROTOCOL ON ACCESS AND
BENEFIT-SHARING IN PERSPECTIVE: IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERNATIONAL LAW AND
IMPLEMENTATION CHALLENGES, 1: 83−122. WOS:000338877200004
51) Cho, AY,
2017. Practical Implementation Issues for the Convention on Biological
Diversity and the Nagoya Protocol from a Korean Perspective,
KOREAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL AND COMPARATIVE LAW, 5: 61−82. DOI:
10.1163/22134484-12340079. WOS:000408760500004
52)
Christmann, S, 2019. Under which conditions would a wide support be
likely for a Multilateral Environmental Agreement for pollinator
protection?, ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE &
POLICY, 91: 1−5. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.10.004. WOS:000452343200001
53) Cifuentes,
GE, 2015. FAO TREATY CONTRIBUTIONS: THE CREATION OF AN INTERNATIONAL
SYSTEM ON ACCESS AND BENEFIT SHARING,
JURIDICAS CUC, 11: 73−100. DOI: 10.17981/juridcuc.11.1.2015.4.
WOS:000379553600005
54) Cock, MJW;
van Lenteren, JC; Brodeur, J; Barratt, BIP; Bigler, F; Bolckmans, K;
Consoli, FL; Haas, F; Mason, PG; Parra, JRP, 2010. Do new Access and
Benefit Sharing procedures under the Convention on Biological Diversity
threaten the future of biological control?,
BIOCONTROL, 55: 199−218. DOI:
10.1007/s10526-009-9234-9. WOS:000275536500001
55) Comizzoli,
P; Holt, WV, 2016. Implications of the Nagoya Protocol for genome
resource banks composed of biomaterials from rare and endangered species,
REPRODUCTION FERTILITY AND DEVELOPMENT, 28: 1145−1151. DOI:
10.1071/RD15429. WOS:000378930400012
56) Coolsaet,
B; Pitseys, J, 2015. Fair and Equitable Negotiations? African Influence
and the International Access and Benefit-Sharing Regime,
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 15: 38−. DOI: 10.1162/GLEP_a_00297.
WOS:000354114300004
57) Coutinot,
D; Briano, J; Parra, JRP; de Sa, LAN; Consoli, FL, 2013. Exchange of
Natural Enemies for Biological Control: Is it a Rocky Road?-The Road in the
Euro-Mediterranean Region and the South American Common Market,
NEOTROPICAL ENTOMOLOGY, 42: 1−14. DOI: 10.1007/s13744-012-0103-3.
WOS:000314275200001
58) Crouch,
NR; Douwes, E; Wolfson, MM; Smith, GF; Edwards, TJ, 2008. South Africa's
bioprospecting, access and benefit-sharing legislation: current realities,
future complications, and a proposed alternative,
SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, 104:
355−366. WOS:000262187200009
59) da Silva,
M, 2019. Brazil, example of a non-Nagoya Protocol country,
MICROBIOLOGY AUSTRALIA, 40: 106−108. DOI: 10.1071/MA19029.
WOS:000489065800005
60) David, B,
2012. Implications of Nagoya protocol implementation for the
pharmaceutical and cosmetic industries,
PLANTA MEDICA, 78: 1058−1058.
WOS:000307042800108
61) David, B,
2018. New regulations for accessing plant biodiversity samples, what is
ABS?, PHYTOCHEMISTRY REVIEWS, 17:
1211−1223. DOI: 10.1007/s11101-018-9573-1. WOS:000448484600012
62) David, B;
Wolfender, JL; Dias, DA, 2015. The pharmaceutical industry and natural
products: historical status and new trends,
PHYTOCHEMISTRY REVIEWS, 14:
299−315. DOI: 10.1007/s11101-014-9367-z. WOS:000352153000006
63) Davis, K;
Smit, MF; Kidd, M; Sharrock, S; Allenstein, P, 2015. An access and
benefit-sharing awareness survey for botanic gardens: Are they prepared for
the Nagoya Protocol?, SOUTH AFRICAN
JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 98: 148−156. DOI: 10.1016/j.sajb.2015.01.015.
WOS:000353612300020
64) De Jonge,
B, 2011. What is Fair and Equitable Benefit-sharing?,
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL &
ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS, 24: 127−146. DOI: 10.1007/s10806-010-9249-3.
WOS:000287458900004
65) de Ponti,
O; van den Hurk, A, 2009. Access to Biodiversity: New Rules of the Game,
XXIII INTERNATIONAL EUCARPIA
SYMPOSIUM, SECTION ORNAMENTALS: COLOURFUL BREEDING AND GENETICS, 836:
15−17. WOS:000305703000001
66) De Santo,
EM; Jones, PJS; Miller, AMM, 2011. Fortress conservation at sea A
commentary on the Chagos marine protected area,
MARINE POLICY, 35: 258−260. DOI:
10.1016/j.marpol.2010.09.004. WOS:000285440200020
67) Declerck,
S; Willems, A; van der Heijden, MGA; Varese, GC; Turkovskaya, O; Evtushenko,
L; Ivshina, I; Desmeth, P, 2015. PERN: art EU-Russia initiative for
rhizosphere microbial resources,
TRENDS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY, 33: 377−380. DOI:
10.1016/j.tibtech.2015.03.005. WOS:000357356300003
68)
Dedeurwaerdere, T; Broggiato, A; Louafi, S; Welch, EW; Batur, F, 2013.
Governing Global Scientific Research Commons under the Nagoya Protocol,
2010 NAGOYA PROTOCOL ON ACCESS AND BENEFIT-SHARING IN PERSPECTIVE:
IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERNATIONAL LAW AND IMPLEMENTATION CHALLENGES, 1:
389−421. WOS:000338877200014
69)
Dedeurwaerdere, T; Melindi-Ghidi, P; Broggiato, A, 2016. Global
scientific research commons under the Nagoya Protocol: Towards a
collaborative economy model for the sharing of basic research assets,
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 55:
1−10. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.08.006. WOS:000366775200001
70) Delgado,
NA, 2016. COMMUNITY PROTOCOLS AS TOOLS FOR RESISTING EXCLUSION IN GLOBAL
ENVIRONMENTAL GOVERNANCE, RAE-REVISTA
DE ADMINISTRACAO DE EMPRESAS, 56: 395−410. DOI:
10.1590/S0034-759020160404. WOS:000383045600004
71) Delmas, M;
Rana, AS, 2017. THE SUD EXPERT PLANTES DEVELOPPEMENT DURABLE (SEP2D)
PROGRAM, SUPPORTING GLOBAL STRATEGY FOR PLANT CONSERVATION (GSPC)
ACHIEVEMENT AND THE AICHI TARGETS,
ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN, 102: 357−363. DOI:
10.3417/D-16-00014A. WOS:000407683300019
72) Demunshi,
Y; Chugh, A, 2010. Role of traditional knowledge in marine
bioprospecting, BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 19: 3015−3033. DOI:
10.1007/s10531-010-9879-9. WOS:000282870700002
73)
Deplazes-Zemp, A, 2018. Commutative Justice and Access and Benefit
Sharing for Genetic Resources, ETHICS
POLICY & ENVIRONMENT, 21: 110−126. DOI: 10.1080/21550085.2018.1448042.
WOS:000433517000020
74)
Deplazes-Zemp, A, 2018. 'Genetic resources', an analysis of a
multifaceted concept, BIOLOGICAL
CONSERVATION, 222: 86−94. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.03.031.
WOS:000434745900009
75)
Deplazes-Zemp, A, 2019. Challenges of Justice in the Context of Plant
Genetic Resources, FRONTIERS IN PLANT
SCIENCE, 10: −. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01266. WOS:000494462200001
76)
Deplazes-Zemp, A; Abiven, S; Schaber, P; Schaepman, M; Schaepman-Strub, G;
Schmid, B; Shimizu, KK; Altermatt, F, 2018. The Nagoya Protocol could
backfire on the Global South, NATURE
ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2: 917−919. DOI: 10.1038/s41559-018-0561-z.
WOS:000435569300005
77) Dohm, A,
2017. Ornamental plant breeding in a changing competitive environment,
ZWEITES SYMPOSIUM
ZIERPFLANZENZUCHTUNG, 2017, 457: 61−63. DOI: 10.5073/jka.2017.457.014.
WOS:000414274800013
78) Dorr, D,
2019. Biopiracy and the right to self-determination of indigenous
peoples, PHYTOMEDICINE, 53:
308−312. DOI: 10.1016/j.phymed.2018.10.019. WOS:000459935700034
79) Drankier,
P; Elferink, AGO; Visser, B; Takacs, T, 2012. Marine Genetic Resources
in Areas beyond National Jurisdiction: Access and Benefit-Sharing,
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MARINE AND COASTAL LAW, 27: 375−433. DOI:
10.1163/157180812X637984. WOS:000313823900007
80) Droste, N;
Farley, J; Ring, I; May, PH; Ricketts, TH, 2020. Designing a global
mechanism for intergovernmental biodiversity financing,
CONSERVATION LETTERS, : −. DOI:
10.1111/conl.12670. WOS:000480152500001
81) Dutfield,
G, 2017. TK unlimited: The emerging but incoherent international law of
traditional knowledge protection,
JOURNAL OF WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, 20: 144−159. DOI:
10.1111/jwip.12085. WOS:000414696000001
82) Efferth, T; Banerjee, M; Abu-Darwish, MS;
Abdelfatah, S; Bockers, M; Bhakta-Guha, D; Bolzani, V; Daak, S; Demirezer,
OL; Dawood, M; Efferth, M; El-Seedi, HR; Fischer, N; Greten, HJ; Hamdoun, S;
Hong, CL; Horneber, M; Kadioglu, O; Khalid, HE; Khalid, SA; K, 2019.
Biopiracy versus One-World Medicine-From colonial relicts to global
collaborative concepts,
PHYTOMEDICINE, 53: 319−331. DOI: 10.1016/j.phymed.2018.06.007.
WOS:000459935700036
83) Eimer, TR;
Bartels, T, 2020. From consent to consultation: Indigenous rights and
the new environmental constitutionalism,
ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 29:
235−256. DOI: 10.1080/09644016.2019.1595884. WOS:000515530800003
84)
Ejnavarzala, H, 2010. DNA barcoding: access to biodiversity and
benefit-sharing policy issues in the Indian context,
CURRENT SCIENCE, 99: 594−600.
WOS:000282445000021
85) Engels,
JMM; Thormann, I, 2007. Horticultural genetic resources collections:
Their characteristics, strengths and weaknesses,
PROCEEDINGS OF THE SECOND
INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON PLANT GENETIC RESOURCES OF HORTICULTURAL CROPS,
VOLS 1 AND 2, : 33−. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2007.760.2.
WOS:000252298000002
86) Engels,
JMM; Dempewolf, H; Henson-Apollonio, V, 2011. Ethical Considerations in
Agro-biodiversity Research, Collecting, and Use,
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL &
ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS, 24: 107−126. DOI: 10.1007/s10806-010-9251-9.
WOS:000287458900003
87) Filoche,
G, 2013. Domestic biodiplomacy: navigating between provider and user
categories for genetic resources in Brazil and French Guiana,
INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL AGREEMENTS-POLITICS LAW AND ECONOMICS, 13:
177−196. DOI: 10.1007/s10784-012-9184-z. WOS:000317648000004
88) Fisher, W,
2018. THE PUZZLE OF TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE,
DUKE LAW JOURNAL, 67: 1511−1578.
WOS:000431824200004
89) Fowler, C,
2004. Regime change−Plant genetic resources in international law,
OUTLOOK ON AGRICULTURE, 33: 7−14. DOI: 10.5367/000000004322877737.
WOS:000220903300002
90) Fowler, C,
2004. Accessing genetic resources: international law establishes
multilateral system, GENETIC
RESOURCES AND CROP EVOLUTION, 51: 609−620. DOI:
10.1023/B:GRES.0000024646.81612.1f. WOS:000220927800006
91) Fraleigh,
B; Davidson, CG, 2003. Overview of the international treaty on plant
genetic resources for food and agriculture with emphasis on its significance
for horticultural crops, PLANT
GENETIC RESOURCES: THE FABRIC OF HORTICULTURE’S FUTURE, : 19−32. DOI:
10.17660/ActaHortic.2003.623.2. WOS:000186004000001
92) Fusi, F;
Welch, EW; Siciliano, M, 2019. Barriers and facilitators of access to
biological material for international research: The role of institutions and
networks, SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY,
46: 275−289. DOI: 10.1093/scipol/scy057. WOS:000493011600011
93) Galluzzi,
G; Halewood, M; Noriega, IL; Vernooy, R, 2016. Twenty-five years of
international exchanges of plant genetic resources facilitated by the CGIAR
genebanks: a case study on global interdependence,
BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 25:
1421−1446. DOI: 10.1007/s10531-016-1109-7. WOS:000379026600002
94) Geary, J;
Camicioli, E; Bubela, T, 2016. DNA barcoding in the media: does coverage
of cool science reflect its social context?,
GENOME, 59: 738−750. DOI:
10.1139/gen-2015-0210. WOS:000383782500010
95) George, M;
George, AR, 2018. Registration of BBNJ Research Activities: A Move
towards Transparency in Research Governance,
JOURNAL OF EAST ASIA AND
INTERNATIONAL LAW, 11: 121−143. DOI: 10.14330/jeail.2018.11.1.06.
WOS:000433512600008
96) Gewin, V,
2016. Nagoya Protocol: curveball for biodiversity research?,
FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 14: 176−176.
WOS:000375676200003
97) Ghijsen,
H, 2009. Intellectual property rights and access rules for germplasm:
benefit or straitjacket?, EUPHYTICA,
170: 229−234. DOI: 10.1007/s10681-009-9941-4. WOS:000270651200019
98) Glowka, L;
Normand, V, 2013. Chapter 1. The Nagoya Protocol on Access and
Benefit-sharing: Innovations in International Environmental Law,
2010 NAGOYA PROTOCOL ON ACCESS AND
BENEFIT-SHARING IN PERSPECTIVE: IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERNATIONAL LAW AND
IMPLEMENTATION CHALLENGES, 1: 21−51. WOS:000338877200002
99) Golan, J;
Athayde, S; Olson, EA; McAlvay, A, 2019. Intellectual Property Rights
and Ethnobiology: An Update on Posey's Call to Action,
JOURNAL OF ETHNOBIOLOGY, 39:
90−109. DOI: 10.2993/0278-0771-39.1.90. WOS:000463179600006
100)
Gomez-Castro, B; Kipper, R, 2019. Nagoya Protocol on Access and
Benefit-Sharing, MICROBIOLOGY
AUSTRALIA, 40: 103−106. DOI: 10.1071/MA19028. WOS:000489065800004
101) Gottweis,
H; Lauss, G, 2010. Biobank governance in the post-genomic age,
PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 7: 187−195. DOI: 10.2217/PME.10.4.
WOS:000276030800013
102) Grecksch,
K; Holzhausen, J, 2017. Property rights revisited−are narratives the way
forward?, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF
LAW IN THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 9: 94−107. DOI:
10.1108/IJLBE-09-2016-0014. WOS:000407445200001
103) Greiber,
T, 2019. Implementation of the Nagoya Protocol in the European Union and
in Germany, PHYTOMEDICINE, 53:
313−318. DOI: 10.1016/j.phymed.2018.10.020. WOS:000459935700035
104) Groen, L,
2019. Explaining European Union effectiveness (goal achievement) in the
Convention on Biological Diversity: the importance of diplomatic engagement,
INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL
AGREEMENTS-POLITICS LAW AND ECONOMICS, 19: 69−87. DOI:
10.1007/s10784-018-9424-y. WOS:000458192900004
105) Gronvall,
GK, 2015. US COMPETITIVENESS IN SYNTHETIC BIOLOGY,
HEALTH SECURITY, 13: 378−389.
DOI: 10.1089/hs.2015.0046. WOS:000369691800004
106) Halewood,
M; Chiurugwi, T; Hamilton, RS; Kurtz, B; Marden, E; Welch, E; Michiels, F;
Mozafari, J; Sabran, M; Patron, N; Kersey, P; Bastow, R; Dorius, S; Dias, S;
McCouch, S; Powell, W, 2018. Plant genetic resources for food and
agriculture: opportunities and challenges emerging from the science and
information technology revolution,
NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 217: 1407−1419. DOI: 10.1111/nph.14993.
WOS:000424284400005
107)
Harden-Davies, H, 2017. Deep-sea genetic resources: New frontiers for
science and stewardship in areas beyond national jurisdiction,
DEEP-SEA RESEARCH PART II-TOPICAL
STUDIES IN OCEANOGRAPHY, 137: 504−513. DOI: 10.1016/j.dsr2.2016.05.005.
WOS:000398749900040
108)
Hashiguchi, A; Tian, JK; Komatsu, S, 2017. Proteomic Contributions to
Medicinal Plant Research: From Plant Metabolism to Pharmacological Action,
PROTEOMES, 5: −. DOI: 10.3390/proteomes5040035. WOS:000419237600012
109) Havinga,
R; Kool, A; Achille, F; Bavcon, J; Berg, C; Bonomi, C; Burkart, M; De
Meyere, D; Hart, J; Havstrom, M; Kessler, P; Knickmann, B; Koster, N;
Martinez, R; Ostgaard, H; Ravnjak, B; Scheen, AC; Smith, P; Smith, P;
Socher, SA; Vange, V, 2016. The Index Seminum: Seeds of change for seed
exchange, TAXON, 65: 333−336. DOI: 10.12705/652.9. WOS:000375823500009
110) Heeren,
A; Cheikyoussef, A; Chimwamurombe, P, 2016. Commercializing traditional
knowledge: Regulating access and benefit-sharing in Namibia,
PLANTA MEDICA, 82: −. DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1596620.
WOS:000411789300444
111) Heiniger,
U, 2016. Tef (Eragrostis tef (ZUCC.) TROTTER)−gluten-free Grain from
Ethiopia, SCHWEIZERISCHE ZEITSCHRIFT
FUER GANZHEITSMEDIZIN, 28: 281−292. DOI: 10.1159/000446455.
WOS:000392809900008
112) Heinrich,
M; Hesketh, A, 2019. 25 years after the 'Rio Convention'-Lessons learned
in the context of sustainable development and protecting indigenous and
local knowledge, PHYTOMEDICINE, 53:
332−343. DOI: 10.1016/j.phymed.2018.04.061. WOS:000459935700037
113) Hinsley,
A; Roberts, DL, 2018. Assessing the extent of access and benefit sharing
in the wildlife trade: lessons from horticultural orchids in Southeast Asia,
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, 45:
261−268. DOI: 10.1017/S0376892917000467. WOS:000440936800006
114) Houssin,
D, 2017. Global health security at the time of Nagoya,
BULLETIN DE L ACADEMIE NATIONALE DE MEDECINE, 201: 623−629. DOI:
10.1016/S0001-4079(19)30438-8. WOS:000434372600010
115) Huang,
LS; Flavell, R; Donnison, IS; Chiang, YC; Hastings, A; Hayes, C; Heidt, C;
Hong, H; Hsu, TW; Humphreys, M; Jackson, J; Norris, J; Schwarz, KU; Squance,
M; Swaller, T; Thomas, ID; van Assche, W; Xi, QG; Yamada, T; Youell, S;
Clifton-Brown, J, 2019. Collecting wild Miscanthus germplasm in Asia for
crop improvement and conservation in Europe whilst adhering to the
guidelines of the United Nations' Convention on Biological Diversity,
ANNALS OF BOTANY, 124: 591−604.
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcy231. WOS:000503881100008
116)
Humphries, F; Benzie, JAH; Morrison, C, 2019. A systematic quantitative
literature review of aquaculture genetic resource access and benefit
sharing, REVIEWS IN AQUACULTURE, 11: 1133−1147. DOI: 10.1111/raq.12283.
WOS:000495397700009
117)
Humphries, F, 2016. TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER OF AQUATIC GENETIC RESOURCES
UNDER THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY AND THE NAGOYA PROTOCOL:
'SPONGING' OFF PATENT LAW DEFENCES,
UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES LAW JOURNAL, 39: 234−272.
WOS:000383375700007
118)
Humphries, F, 2017. A patent defence approach to sharing aquaculture
genetic resources across jurisdictional areas,
JOURNAL OF WORLD INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY, 20: 221−238. DOI: 10.1111/jwip.12082. WOS:000414696000005
119)
Humphries, F, 2018. Sharing aquatic genetic resources across
jurisdictions: playing 'chicken' in the sea,
INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL
AGREEMENTS-POLITICS LAW AND ECONOMICS, 18: 541−556. DOI:
10.1007/s10784-018-9403-3. WOS:000441114200005
120)
Humphries, F; Robinson, DF; Loban, H, 2017. Implications of Indigenous
Land Tenure Changes for Accessing Indigenous Genetic Resources from Northern
Australia, ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING
LAW JOURNAL, 34: 560−579. WOS:000416405400007
121) Jacob,
SR; Tyagi, V; Agrawal, A; Chakrabarty, SK; Tyagi, RK, 2015. Indian Plant
Germplasm on the Global Platter: An Analysis,
PLOS ONE, 10: −. DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0126634. WOS:000354545600069
122) Johansen,
E, 2017. Future access and improvement of industrial lactic acid
bacteria cultures, MICROBIAL CELL
FACTORIES, 16: −. DOI: 10.1186/s12934-017-0851-1. WOS:000418667900002
123) Jorem, A;
Tvedt, MW, 2014. Bioprospecting in the High Seas: Existing Rights and
Obligations in View of a New Legal Regime for Marine Areas beyond National
Jurisdiction, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL
OF MARINE AND COASTAL LAW, 29: 321−343. DOI: 10.1163/15718085-12341319.
WOS:000338171400004
124)
Kamardeen, N, 2015. Community Rights to Intellectual Property in
Asia-From Rhetoric to Consensus,
JOURNAL OF WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, 18: 311−334. DOI:
10.1111/jwip.12042. WOS:000366971600003
125)
Kariyawasam, K; Tsai, M, 2018. Access to genetic resources and benefit
sharing: Implications of Nagoya Protocol on providers and users,
JOURNAL OF WORLD INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY, 21: 289−305. DOI: 10.1111/jwip.12095. WOS:000450261800002
126) Kim, S;
Seo, AY; Lee, TG, 2020. Functionalized cellulose to remove surfactants
from cosmetic products in wastewater,
CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS, 236: −. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116010.
WOS:000519306900038
127) Knauf, S;
Abel, L; Hallmaier-Wacker, LK, 2019. The Nagoya protocol and research on
emerging infectious diseases,
BULLETIN OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, 97: 379−379. DOI:
10.2471/BLT.19.232173. WOS:000471826300002
128) Kochhar,
S, 2008. Institutions and Capacity Building for the Evolution of
Intellectual Property Rights Regime in India: V−Analysis of Review of TRIPS
Agreement and R&D Prospect in Indian Agriculture under IPR Regime,
JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS, 13: 536−547.
WOS:000260885900018
129)
Kohler-Rollefson, I, 2016. Innovations and diverse livelihood pathways:
alternative livelihoods, livelihood diversification and societal
transformation in pastoral communities,
REVUE SCIENTIFIQUE ET
TECHNIQUE-OFFICE INTERNATIONAL DES EPIZOOTIES, 35: 611−618. DOI:
10.20506/rst.35.2.2529. WOS:000390831100022
130) Koopman,
J, 2005. Reconciliation of proprietary interests in genetic and
knowledge resources: Hurry cautiously!,
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 53:
523−541. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.09.025. WOS:000230162400007
131) Koopman,
J, 2006. Amidst peril and progress,
MEDICINAL AND AROMATIC PLANTS:
AGRICULTURAL, COMMERCIAL, ECOLOGICAL, LEGAL, PHARMACOLOGICAL AND SOCIAL
ASPECTS, 17: 129−154. WOS:000253872800010
132) Koskela,
J; Vinceti, B; Dvorak, W; Bush, D; Dawson, IK; Loo, J; Kjaer, ED; Navarro,
C; Padolina, C; Bordacs, S; Jamnadass, R; Graudal, L; Ramamonjisoa, L, 2014.
Utilization and transfer of forest genetic resources: A global review,
FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 333: 22−34. DOI:
10.1016/j.foreco.2014.07.017. WOS:000347663900003
133) Krigas,
N; Menteli, V; Vokou, D, 2014. The Electronic Trade in Greek Endemic
Plants: Biodiversity, Commercial and Legal Aspects,
ECONOMIC BOTANY, 68: 85−95. DOI:
10.1007/s12231-014-9264-9. WOS:000333128300007
134) Krigas,
N; Menteli, V; Chrysanthou, P; Vokou, D, 2017. The electronic trade in
endemic plants of Cyprus through the Internet,
PLANT BIOSYSTEMS, 151: 387−393.
DOI: 10.1080/11263504.2016.1193069. WOS:000399481200003
135)
Kruitwagen, A; Beukeboom, LW; Wertheim, B, 2018. Optimization of native
biocontrol agents, with parasitoids of the invasive pest Drosophila suzukii
as an example, EVOLUTIONARY APPLICATIONS, 11: 1473−1497. DOI: 10.1111/eva.12648.
WOS:000447131200001
136) Kursar,
TA, 2011. What Are the Implications of the Nagoya Protocol for Research
on Biodiversity?, BIOSCIENCE, 61:
256−257. DOI: 10.1525/bio.2011.61.4.2. WOS:000289319900007
137) Lai, JC;
Robinson, DF; Stirrup, T; Tualima, HY, 2019. Maori knowledge under the
microscope: Appropriation and patenting of matauranga Maori and related
resources, JOURNAL OF WORLD
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, 22: 205−233. DOI: 10.1111/jwip.12125.
WOS:000475965800007
138) Laird,
SA; Wynberg, RP, 2016. Locating Responsible Research and Innovation
Within Access and Benefit Sharing Spaces of the Convention on Biological
Diversity: the Challenge of Emerging Technologies,
NANOETHICS, 10: 189−200. DOI:
10.1007/s11569-016-0268-z. WOS:000380149900008
139) Laird, S;
Wynberg, R; Rourke, M; Humphries, F; Muller, MR; Lawson, C, 2020.
Rethink the expansion of access and benefit sharing,
SCIENCE, 367: 1200−1202. DOI:
10.1126/science.aba9609. WOS:000520023800024
140) Lajaunie,
C; Ho, CWL, 2018. Pathogens collections, biobanks and related-data in a
One Health legal and ethical perspective,
PARASITOLOGY, 145: 688−696. DOI:
10.1017/S0031182017001986. WOS:000439561300015
141) Lallier,
LE; McMeel, O; Greiber, T; Vanagt, T; Dobson, ADW; Jaspars, M, 2014.
Access to and use of marine genetic resources: understanding the legal
framework, NATURAL PRODUCT REPORTS,
31: 612−616. DOI: 10.1039/c3np70123a. WOS:000334603300001
142) Langford,
J, 2004. Discussion paper−Access and benefit-sharing: the role of
scientists, International Expert
Workshop on Access to Genetic Resources and Benefit Sharing, Record of
Discussion, : 256−257. WOS:000243638100040
143) Lawson,
C; Rourke, M, 2016. Open Access DNA, RNA and Amino Acid Sequences: The
Consequences and Solutions for the International Regulation of Access and
Benefit Sharing, JOURNAL OF LAW AND
MEDICINE, 24: 96−118. WOS:000385613600009
144) Lawson,
C, 2011. Patents and Access and Benefit-Sharing Contracts: Conservation
or Just More Red Tape?, BIOTECHNOLOGY
LAW REPORT, 30: 197−206. DOI: 10.1089/blr.2011.9961. WOS:000289556000004
145) Lawson,
C, 2015. The breeder's exemption under UPOV 1991, the Convention on
Biological Diversity and its Nagoya Protocol,
JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW
& PRACTICE, 10: 526−535. DOI: 10.1093/jiplp/jpv080. WOS:000213675700005
146) Lawson,
C; Humphries, F; Rourke, M, 2019. The future of information under the
CBD, Nagoya Protocol, Plant Treaty, and PIP Framework,
JOURNAL OF WORLD INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY, 22: 103−119. DOI: 10.1111/jwip.12118. WOS:000475965800002
147) Lawson,
C; Wraith, J; Pickering, C, 2019. Regulating Wild Collected Orchids? The
CBD, Nagoya Protocol and CITES Overlaps,
ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING LAW
JOURNAL, 36: 339−361. WOS:000483889900004
148) Leary, D,
2008. Greenland's new legislation on commercial and research-related use
of biological resources: implications for the International Polar Year and
later, POLAR RECORD, 44: 97−106.
DOI: 10.1017/S0032247407007073. WOS:000253188200001
149) Leary, D,
2019. Agreeing to disagree on what we have or have not agreed on: The
current state of play of the BBNJ negotiations on the status of marine
genetic resources in areas beyond national jurisdiction,
MARINE POLICY, 99: 21−29. DOI:
10.1016/j.marpol.2018.10.031. WOS:000454467200003
150) Lee, BK;
Sohn, SY, 2016. Patent portfolio-based indicators to evaluate the
commercial benefits of national plant genetic resources,
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 70: 43−52.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.05.002. WOS:000388785200006
151) Lee, S;
Jung, PE; Lee, Y, 2016. Publicly-funded biobanks and networks in East
Asia, SPRINGERPLUS, 5: −. DOI:
10.1186/s40064-016-2723-2. WOS:000381633700002
152) Lee, S;
Nam, S; Jung, PE; Kim, KJ; Lee, Y, 2016. Asian Network of Research
Resource Centers, BIOPRESERVATION AND
BIOBANKING, 14: 424−428. DOI: 10.1089/bio.2016.0008. WOS:000386473600010
153) Lewin, HA; Robinson, GE; Kress, WJ; Baker, WJ;
Coddington, J; Crandall, KA; Durbin, R; Edwards, SV; Forest, F; Gilbert,
MTP; Goldstein, MM; Grigoriev, IV; Hackett, KJ; Haussler, D; Jarvis, ED;
Johnson, WE; Patrinos, A; Richards, S; Castilla-Rubio, JC; van, 2018. Earth
BioGenome Project: Sequencing life for the future of life,
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY
OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 115: 4325−4333. DOI:
10.1073/pnas.1720115115. WOS:000430697500045
154) Li, JS;
van Bueren, ETL; Huang, KJ; Qin, LQ; Song, YC, 2013. The potential of
participatory hybrid breeding,
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SUSTAINABILITY, 11: 234−251. DOI:
10.1080/14735903.2012.728050. WOS:000321484800003
155) Lingard,
K; Perry, M, 2018. An assessment of the regulatory framework of the
Western Australian sandalwood industry,
AUSTRALIAN FORESTRY, 81: 89−101.
DOI: 10.1080/00049158.2017.1420455. WOS:000433542000003
156) Lorenz,
M; Tzvetkova, A, 2017. THE NAGOYA PROTOCOL ON ACCESS AND BENEFIT SHARING
AND ITS IMPLICATION FOR ALGAL CULTURE COLLECTIONS AND THEIR USERS,
PHYCOLOGIA, 56: 122−122. WOS:000412892000256
157) Lorenzen,
B, 2009. Access and Benefit-Sharing under the CBD−What Consequences
Might an International Regime Have for the Horticultural Sector?,
XXIII INTERNATIONAL EUCARPIA SYMPOSIUM, SECTION ORNAMENTALS: COLOURFUL
BREEDING AND GENETICS, 836: 19−24. WOS:000305703000002
158) Louwaars,
NP, 2018. Plant breeding and diversity: A troubled relationship?,
EUPHYTICA, 214: −. DOI: 10.1007/s10681-018-2192-5.
WOS:000435724100002
159) Louwaars,
N, 2019. Open Source Seed, a Revolution in Breeding or Yet Another
Attack on the Breeder's Exemption?,
FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 10: −. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01127.
WOS:000486485500001
160)
Luzuriaga-Quichimbo, CX; Blanco-Salas, J; Munoz-Centeno, LM; Pelaez, R;
Ceron-Martinez, CE; Ruiz-Tellez, T, 2019. In Silico Molecular Studies of
Antiophidic Properties of the Amazonian Tree Cordia nodosa Lam.,
MOLECULES, 24: −. DOI:
10.3390/molecules24224160. WOS:000501529700149
161) Manheim,
BS, 2016. Regulation of synthetic biology under the Nagoya Protocol,
NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 34: 1104−1105. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.3716.
WOS:000387506500018
162) Marden,
E, 2017. US ratification of Plant Treaty: benefit sharing ambiguity for
plant genomics researchers does not change,
GENETIC RESOURCES AND CROP EVOLUTION,
64: 1133−1139. DOI: 10.1007/s10722-017-0528-y. WOS:000404901300005
163)
Mardiastuti, A, 2019. Implementation of Access and Benefit Sharing in
Indonesia: Review and Case Studies,
MANAJEMEN HUTAN TROPIKA, 25: 35−43. DOI: 10.7226/jtfm.25.1.35.
WOS:000467637400004
164) Martin,
A; McGuire, S; Sullivan, S, 2013. Global environmental justice and
biodiversity conservation,
GEOGRAPHICAL JOURNAL, 179: 122−131. DOI: 10.1111/geoj.12018.
WOS:000318567700004
165) Martin,
F; Cahill, A; Wright, E; Stoianoff, N, 2019. An international approach
to establishing a Competent Authority to manage and protect traditional
knowledge, ALTERNATIVE LAW JOURNAL,
44: 48−55. DOI: 10.1177/1037969X18815254. WOS:000463030800009
166) Martinez,
SI; Biber-Klemm, S, 2010. Scientists−take action for access to
biodiversity, CURRENT OPINION IN
ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2: 27−33. DOI:
10.1016/j.cosust.2010.03.004. WOS:000282613400005
167) Martins,
J; Cruz, D; Vasconcelos, V, 2020. The Nagoya Protocol and Its
Implications on the EU Atlantic Area Countries,
JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE AND
ENGINEERING, 8: 92−. DOI: 10.3390/jmse8020092. WOS:000519244200081
168) Martins,
J; Cruz, D; Vasconcelos, V, 2020. The Nagoya Protocol and Its
Implications on the EU Atlantic Arc Countries Legislation,
MARINE DRUGS, 18: −.
WOS:000513184600236
169)
Martyniuk, E, 2011. Do we need a binding treaty for access and
benefit-sharing in animal genetic resources?,
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BREEDING AND
GENETICS, 128: 85−86. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2011.00919.x.
WOS:000288165600001
170)
Martyniuk, E; Berger, B; Bojkovski, D; Bouchel, D; Hiemstra, SJ; Marguerat,
C; Matlova, V; Saether, N, 2017. Possible consequences of the Nagoya
Protocol for animal breeding and the worldwide exchange of animal genetic
resources, ACTA AGRICULTURAE SCANDINAVICA SECTION A-ANIMAL SCIENCE, 67: 96−106.
DOI: 10.1080/09064702.2018.1435714. WOS:000441768800002
171) Mason,
PG; Cock, MJW; Barratt, BIP; Klapwijk, JN; van Lenteren, JC; Brodeur, J;
Hoelmer, KA; Heimpel, GE, 2018. Best practices for the use and exchange
of invertebrate biological control genetic resources relevant for food and
agriculture, BIOCONTROL, 63:
149−154. DOI: 10.1007/s10526-017-9810-3. WOS:000422647200011
172)
Matseketsa, G; Chibememe, G; Muboko, N; Gandiwa, E; Takarinda, K, 2018.
Towards an Understanding of Conservation-Based Costs, Benefits, and
Attitudes of Local People Living Adjacent to Save Valley Conservancy,
Zimbabwe, SCIENTIFICA, : −. DOI: 10.1155/2018/6741439. WOS:000444954100001
173) McCluskey, K; Barker, KB; Barton, HA;
Boundy-Mills, K; Brown, DR; Coddington, JA; Cook, K; Desmeth, P; Geiser, D;
Glaeser, JA; Greene, S; Kang, S; Lomas, MW; Melcher, U; Miller, SE; Nobles,
DR; Owens, KJ; Reichman, JH; Silva, MD; Wertz, J; Whitworth, C; S, 2017. The
US Culture Collection Network Responding to the Requirements of the Nagoya
Protocol on Access and Benefit Sharing,
MBIO, 8: −. DOI:
10.1128/mBio.00982-17. WOS:000409384300059
174) McCune,
LM, 2018. The Protection of Indigenous Peoples' Seed Rights during
Ethnobotanical Research, ETHNOBIOLOGY
LETTERS, 9: 67−75. DOI: 10.14237/ebl.9.1.2018.1076. WOS:000439054300008
175) McNeely,
JA, 2011. What more can plant scientists do to help save the green
stuff?, BOTANICAL JOURNAL OF THE
LINNEAN SOCIETY, 166: 233−239. DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2011.01151.x.
WOS:000292102000004
176) Medaglia,
JC; Perron-Welch, F, 2019. The benefit-sharing principle in
international law, JOURNAL OF
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW & PRACTICE, 14: 62−76. DOI:
10.1093/jiplp/jpy162. WOS:000456011600009
177) Medaglia,
JC, 2013. The Implementation of the Nagoya Protocol in Latin America and
the Caribbean: Challenges and Opportunities,
2010 NAGOYA PROTOCOL ON ACCESS AND
BENEFIT-SHARING IN PERSPECTIVE: IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERNATIONAL LAW AND
IMPLEMENTATION CHALLENGES, 1: 331−368. WOS:000338877200012
178)
Mendenhall, E; De Santo, E; Nyman, E; Tiller, R, 2019. A soft treaty,
hard to reach: The second inter-governmental conference for biodiversity
beyond national jurisdiction, MARINE
POLICY, 108: −. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2019.103664. WOS:000495518700032
179) Messing,
R; Brodeur, J, 2018. Current challenges to the implementation of
classical biological control,
BIOCONTROL, 63: 1−9. DOI: 10.1007/s10526-017-9862-4. WOS:000422647200001
180) Moore, G;
Engels, J; Fowler, C, 2007. The International Treaty on Plant Genetic
Resources for Food and Agriculture: Access, benefit sharing and
conservation, PROCEEDINGS OF THE
SECOND INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON PLANT GENETIC RESOURCES OF HORTICULTURAL
CROPS, VOLS 1 AND 2, : 27−. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2007.760.1.
WOS:000252298000001
181) Morgera,
E, 2012. Bilateralism at the Service of Community Interests?
Non-Judicial Enforcement of Global Public Goods in the Context of Global
Environmental Law, EUROPEAN JOURNAL
OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, 23: 743−767. DOI: 10.1093/ejil/chs037.
WOS:000310153600009
182) Morioka,
H, 2018. Research Compliance with the Nagoya Protocol,
JAPANESE JOURNAL OF APPLIED ENTOMOLOGY AND ZOOLOGY, 62: 21−28. DOI:
10.1303/jjaez.2018.21. WOS:000428005200003
183) Morris,
C, 2019. A 'Homeland's' Harvest: Biotraffic and Biotrade in the
Contemporary Ciskei Region of South Africa,
JOURNAL OF SOUTHERN AFRICAN STUDIES,
45: 597−616. DOI: 10.1080/03057070.2019.1632667. WOS:000479794300001
184) Mulesa,
TH; Westengen, OT, 2020. Against the grain? A historical institutional
analysis of access governance of plant genetic resources for food and
agriculture in Ethiopia, JOURNAL OF
WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, 23: 82−120. DOI: 10.1111/jwip.12142.
WOS:000509423000001
185) Munyi, P;
Jonas, H, 2013. Chapter 7. Implementing the Nagoya Protocol in Africa:
Opportunities and Challenges for African Indigenous Peoples and Local
Communities, 2010 NAGOYA PROTOCOL ON
ACCESS AND BENEFIT-SHARING IN PERSPECTIVE: IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERNATIONAL
LAW AND IMPLEMENTATION CHALLENGES, 1: 217−245. WOS:000338877200008
186) Myburgh,
AF, 2011. Legal developments in the protection of plant-related
traditional knowledge: An intellectual property lawyer's perspective of the
international and South African legal framework,
SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 77:
844−849. DOI: 10.1016/j.sajb.2011.09.003. WOS:000298123500004
187) Neto, JS,
2019. THE PROTECTION OF TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE IN THE CONTEXT OF
GLOBALIZATION OF LAW, REVISTA POS
CIENCIAS SOCIAIS, 16: 209−228. WOS:000500358500010
188) Neumann,
D; Lohne, C; Casino, A; Bodegard, J; Lyal, CHC; Nivart, A; Williams, C;
Giere, P, 2015. The sustainable use of global biodiversity: scope and
relevance of the Nagoya Protocol and the Convention of Biological Diversity
for Natural History Collections and researchers,
GENOME, 58: 261−261.
WOS:000360861200287
189) Neumann,
D; Borisenko, AV; Coddington, JA; Hauser, CL; Butler, CR; Casino, A; Vogel,
JC; Haszprunar, G; Giere, P, 2018. Global biodiversity research tied up
by juridical interpretations of access and benefit sharing,
ORGANISMS DIVERSITY & EVOLUTION, 18: 1−12. DOI:
10.1007/s13127-017-0347-1. WOS:000427516200001
190) Nijar,
GS, 2011. Food security and access and benefit sharing laws relating to
genetic resources: promoting synergies in national and international
governance, INTERNATIONAL
ENVIRONMENTAL AGREEMENTS-POLITICS LAW AND ECONOMICS, 11: 99−116. DOI:
10.1007/s10784-010-9131-9. WOS:000293789200001
191) Nijar,
GS, 2013. Chapter 8. An Asian Developing Country's View on the
Implementation Challenges of the Nagoya Protocol,
2010 NAGOYA PROTOCOL ON ACCESS AND
BENEFIT-SHARING IN PERSPECTIVE: IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERNATIONAL LAW AND
IMPLEMENTATION CHALLENGES, 1: 247−268. WOS:000338877200009
192) Nijar,
GS; Louafi, S; Welch, EW, 2017. The implementation of the Nagoya ABS
Protocol for the research sector: experience and challenges,
INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL AGREEMENTS-POLITICS LAW AND ECONOMICS, 17:
607−621. DOI: 10.1007/s10784-016-9328-7. WOS:000410711800001
193) Ninawe,
AS; Indulkar, ST, 2017. Intellectual Property Rights and Innovation in
Marine Biotechnology, ASIAN
BIOTECHNOLOGY AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW, 19: 31−49. WOS:000416761500003
194) Njamnshi,
AB, 2004. Discussion paper−Towards an international regime that stresses
infrastructural capacity development in the source countries as a key factor
for effective access and benefit sharing in bioprospecting,
International Expert Workshop on Access to Genetic Resources and Benefit
Sharing, Record of Discussion, : 130−133. WOS:000243638100016
195) Noriega, IL; Halewood, M; Abberton, M; Amri, A;
Angarawai, II; Anglin, N; Blummel, M; Bouman, B; Campos, H; Costich, D;
Ellis, D; Gaur, PM; Guarino, L; Hanson, J; Kommerell, V; Kumar, L; Lusty, C;
Ndjiondjop, MN; Payne, T; Peters, M; Popova, E; Prakash, G, 2019. CGIAR
Operations under the Plant Treaty Framework,
CROP SCIENCE, 59: 819−832. DOI:
10.2135/cropsci2018.08.0526. WOS:000468206500001
196) Oberthur,
S; Groen, L, 2015. The Effectiveness Dimension of the EU's Performance
in International Institutions: Toward a More Comprehensive Assessment
Framework, JCMS-JOURNAL OF COMMON
MARKET STUDIES, 53: 1319−1335. DOI: 10.1111/jcms.12279.
WOS:000363522000008
197) Oberthur,
S; Pozarowska, J, 2013. Managing Institutional Complexity and
Fragmentation: The Nagoya Protocol and the Global Governance of Genetic
Resources, GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 13: 100−. DOI: 10.1162/GLEP_a_00185.
WOS:000322780100006
198) Oberthur,
S; Rabitz, F, 2014. On the EU's performance and leadership in global
environmental governance: the case of the Nagoya Protocol,
JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN PUBLIC POLICY, 21: 39−57. DOI:
10.1080/13501763.2013.834547. WOS:000328243100003
199) Oldham,
P; Hall, S; Forero, O, 2013. Biological Diversity in the Patent System,
PLOS ONE, 8: −. DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0078737. WOS:000327252100047
200) Oliva, M,
2010. Access and benefit sharing and the ethical sourcing of
biodiversity, PLANTA MEDICA, 76:
1177−1177. WOS:000282066500058
201) Oliva,
MJ, 2011. Sharing the Benefits of Biodiversity: A New International
Protocol and its Implications for Research and Development,
PLANTA MEDICA, 77: 1221−1227.
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1279978. WOS:000293007700017
202) Oliva,
MJ, 2013. The Implications of the Nagoya Protocol for the Ethical
Sourcing of Biodiversity, 2010 NAGOYA
PROTOCOL ON ACCESS AND BENEFIT-SHARING IN PERSPECTIVE: IMPLICATIONS FOR
INTERNATIONAL LAW AND IMPLEMENTATION CHALLENGES, 1: 371−387.
WOS:000338877200013
203) Oliva,
MJ, 2015. Ethical BioTrade, Biodiversity and Sustainable Development,
ASIAN BIOTECHNOLOGY AND DEVELOPMENT
REVIEW, 17: 39−55. WOS:000377889700004
204) Olsen,
RT, 2013. Asian Germplasm in American Horticulture: New Thoughts on an
Old Theme, HORTSCIENCE, 48:
1073−1077. DOI: 10.21273/HORTSCI.48.9.1073. WOS:000326305700002
205) Orsini,
A, 2016. Do Non-State Perspectives Matter for Treaty Ratification and
Implementation? The case of the European Consultation on the Nagoya
protocol, ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY AND GOVERNANCE, 26: 377−393. DOI:
10.1002/eet.1712. WOS:000388299000005
206) Overmann,
J; Scholz, AH, 2017. Microbiological Research Under the Nagoya Protocol:
Facts and Fiction, TRENDS IN
MICROBIOLOGY, 25: 85−88. DOI: 10.1016/j.tim.2016.11.001.
WOS:000393723100001
207) Overmann,
J, 2015. Significance and future role of microbial resource centers,
SYSTEMATIC AND APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY,
38: 258−265. DOI: 10.1016/j.syapm.2015.02.008. WOS:000356644900008
208) Park, JM;
Hong, JW; Son, JS; Hwang, YJ; Cho, HM; You, YH; Ghim, SY, 2018. A
strategy for securing unique microbial resources−focusing on Dokdo
islands-derived microbial resources,
ISRAEL JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 64: 1−15. DOI:
10.1163/22244662-20181024. WOS:000457990500001
209) Parks, L,
2018. Challenging power from the bottom up? Community protocols,
benefit-sharing, and the challenge of dominant discourses,
GEOFORUM, 88: 87−95. DOI:
10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.11.011. WOS:000427212800012
210) Pateiro,
LM, 2020. Advances and uncertainties in compliance measures for users
from the Nagoya Protocol in the European Union,
REVIEW OF EUROPEAN COMPARATIVE &
INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW, : −. DOI: 10.1111/reel.12320.
WOS:000510601700001
211) Pauchard,
N, 2017. Access and Benefit Sharing under the Convention on Biological
Diversity and Its Protocol: What Can Some Numbers Tell Us about the
Effectiveness of the Regulatory Regime?,
RESOURCES-BASEL, 6: −. DOI:
10.3390/resources6010011. WOS:000398704000010
212) Pavone,
IR, 2018. The Nagoya Protocol and the updation of the principle of
Access and Benefit Sharing with particular reference to user compliance
pillar, BIOLAW JOURNAL-RIVISTA DI BIODIRITTO, : 251−273. WOS:000427558700031
213) Pavoni,
R, 2013. Chapter 6. The Nagoya Protocol and WTO Law,
2010 NAGOYA PROTOCOL ON ACCESS AND BENEFIT-SHARING IN PERSPECTIVE:
IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERNATIONAL LAW AND IMPLEMENTATION CHALLENGES, 1:
185−213. WOS:000338877200007
214) Pedrollo,
CT; Kinupp, VF, 2015. Sustainability or Colonialism? Legislative
obstacles to research and development of natural products and patents on
traditional knowledge in Brazil, ACTA
BOTANICA BRASILICA, 29: 452−456. DOI: 10.1590/0102-33062015abb0101.
WOS:000361864400019
215)
Pellegrini, PA; Balatti, GE, 2016. Noah's arks in the XXI century. A
typology of seed banks, BIODIVERSITY
AND CONSERVATION, 25: 2753−2769. DOI: 10.1007/s10531-016-1201-z.
WOS:000387475900011
216) Perdue,
DO, 2016. Whither Innovation: The R&D Sector and the Nagoya Protocol at
One Year After Entry into Force,
BIOTECHNOLOGY LAW REPORT, 35: 9−17. DOI: 10.1089/blr.2016.28999.dop.
WOS:000369992100008
217) Perdue,
DO, 2017. Patent Disclosure Requirements Related to Genetic Resources:
The Right Tool for the Job?,
BIOTECHNOLOGY LAW REPORT, 36: 285−296. DOI: 10.1089/blr.2017.29042.dop.
WOS:000418055400009
218) Polski,
M, 2005. The institutional economics of biodiversity, biological
materials, and bioprospecting,
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 53: 543−557. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.09.024.
WOS:000230162400008
219) Prajeesh,
P, 2017. India lays the cornerstone of biodiversity access and benefit
sharing system, CURRENT SCIENCE, 112:
24−28. WOS:000392355900007
220)
Prathapan, KD; Rajan, PD, 2011. Biodiversity access and benefit-sharing:
weaving a rope of sand, CURRENT
SCIENCE, 100: 290−293. WOS:000287537300009
221)
Puig-Marco, R, 2014. Access and benefit sharing of Antarctica's
Biological Material, MARINE GENOMICS,
17: 73−78. DOI: 10.1016/j.margen.2014.04.008. WOS:000345476000012
222) Pythoud,
F, 2004. Vision and nature of an international regime on access and
benefit-sharing (ABS), International
Expert Workshop on Access to Genetic Resources and Benefit Sharing, Record
of Discussion, : 101−104. WOS:000243638100009
223) Rabitz,
F, 2017. Access without benefit-sharing: design, effectiveness and
reform of the FAO seed treaty,
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE COMMONS, 11: 621−640. DOI:
10.18352/ijc.736. WOS:000413186700002
224) Rabitz,
F, 2018. Regime complexes, critical actors and institutional layering,
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
AND DEVELOPMENT, 21: 300−321. DOI: 10.1057/jird.2016.16.
WOS:000436615700003
225) Rabone,
M; Harden-Davies, H; Collins, JE; Zajderman, S; Appeltans, W; Droege, G;
Brandt, A; Pardo-Lopez, L; Dahlgren, TG; Glover, AG; Horton, T, 2019.
Access to Marine Genetic Resources (MGR): Raising Awareness of Best-Practice
Through a New Agreement for Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction
(BBNJ), FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE, 6: −. DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2019.00520.
WOS:000485256000002
226) Rana, RS,
2014. Global governance and national mechanisms in India for regulating
access to genetic resources and benefit sharing,
INDIAN JOURNAL OF GENETICS AND PLANT
BREEDING, 74: 656−664. DOI: 10.5958/0975-6906.2014.00906.7.
WOS:000350899400021
227) Ravi, SB,
2006. Infirmities and inconsistencies of Indian legislations on access
and benefit sharing, CURRENT SCIENCE,
90: 15−19. WOS:000234742100007
228) Reihling,
HCW, 2008. Bioprospecting the African Renaissance: The new value of
muthi in South Africa, JOURNAL OF
ETHNOBIOLOGY AND ETHNOMEDICINE, 4: −. DOI: 10.1186/1746-4269-4-9.
WOS:000209491000009
229) Renner,
SC; Neumann, D; Burkart, M; Feit, U; Giere, P; Groger, A; Paulsch, A;
Paulsch, C; Sterz, M; Vohland, K, 2012. Import and export of biological
samples from tropical countries-considerations and guidelines for research
teams, ORGANISMS DIVERSITY &
EVOLUTION, 12: 81−98. DOI: 10.1007/s13127-012-0076-4.
WOS:000305527700007
230)
Richerzhagen, C; Holm-Mueller, K, 2005. The effectiveness of access and
benefit sharing in Costa Rica: Implications for national and international
regimes, ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 53:
445−460. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.06.031. WOS:000230162400002
231)
Richerzhagen, C, 2011. Effective governance of access and
benefit-sharing under the Convention on Biological Diversity,
BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 20:
2243−2261. DOI: 10.1007/s10531-011-0086-0. WOS:000293286300010
232) Ridings,
P, 2018. Redefining environmental stewardship to deliver governance
frameworks for marine biodiversity beyond national jurisdiction,
ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE, 75: 435−443. DOI:
10.1093/icesjms/fsx122. WOS:000424080500040
233) Robinson,
DF; Forsyth, M, 2016. People, plants, place, and rules: the Nagoya
Protocol in pacific island countries,
GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 54: 324−335. DOI: 10.1111/1745-5871.12178.
WOS:000386911500009
234) Robinson,
D; Raven, M, 2017. Identifying and Preventing Biopiracy in Australia:
patent landscapes and legal geographies for plants with Indigenous
Australian uses, AUSTRALIAN
GEOGRAPHER, 48: 311−331. DOI: 10.1080/00049182.2016.1229240.
WOS:000401453900002
235) Robinson,
DF; Raven, M, 2020. Recognising Indigenous customary law of totemic
plant species: Challenges and pathways,
GEOGRAPHICAL JOURNAL, 186: −.
DOI: 10.1111/geoj.12320. WOS:000481016800001
236) Robinson,
DF, 2013. Legal Geographies of Intellectual Property, 'Traditional'
Knowledge and Biodiversity: Experiencing Conventions, Laws, Customary Law,
and Karma in Thailand, GEOGRAPHICAL
RESEARCH, 51: 375−386. DOI: 10.1111/1745-5871.12022. WOS:000326734600004
237) Rolfova,
E, 2019. National Legal Framework on Nagoya Protocol,
SEED AND SEEDLINGS XIV, : 10−12. WOS:000519118700001
238) Rosendal,
K; Andresen, S, 2016. Realizing access and benefit sharing from use of
genetic resources between diverging international regimes: the scope for
leadership, INTERNATIONAL
ENVIRONMENTAL AGREEMENTS-POLITICS LAW AND ECONOMICS, 16: 579−596. DOI:
10.1007/s10784-014-9271-4. WOS:000379544200007
239) Rosendal,
GK; Myhr, AI; Tvedt, MW, 2016. Access and Benefit Sharing Legislation
for Marine Bioprospecting: Lessons From Australia for the Role of Marbank in
Norway, JOURNAL OF WORLD INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY, 19: 86−98. DOI: 10.1111/jwip.12058. WOS:000380252500001
240) Rourke,
MF, 2018. Who Are "Indigenous and Local Communities" and What Is
"Traditional Knowledge" for Virus Access and Benefit-sharing? A Textual
Analysis of the Convention on Biological Diversity and Its Nagoya Protocol,
JOURNAL OF LAW AND MEDICINE, 25:
707−726. WOS:000429238400008
241) Rourke,
MF, 2018. Never Mind the Science, Here's the Convention on Biological
Diversity: Viral Sovereignty in the Smallpox Destruction Debate,
JOURNAL OF LAW AND MEDICINE, 25: 429−447. WOS:000425991800010
242) Rourke,
MF, 2018. When knowledge goes viral: Assessing the possibility of
virus-related traditional knowledge for access and benefit-sharing,
JOURNAL OF WORLD INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY, 21: 356−368. DOI: 10.1111/jwip.12100. WOS:000450261800005
243) Rourke,
MF, 2019. Access by Design, Benefits if Convenient: A Closer Look at the
Pandemic Influenza Preparedness Framework's Standard Material Transfer
Agreements, MILBANK QUARTERLY, 97:
91−112. DOI: 10.1111/1468-0009.12364. WOS:000461860200012
244) Ryan, MJ;
McCluskey, K; Verkleij, G; Robert, V; Smith, D, 2019. Fungal biological
resources to support international development: challenges and
opportunities, WORLD JOURNAL OF
MICROBIOLOGY & BIOTECHNOLOGY, 35: −. DOI: 10.1007/s11274-019-2709-7.
WOS:000482913800002
245) Sand
Sava, C; Antofie, MM, 2018. CAPACITY BUILDING NEEDS FOR COMPLYING WITH
THE REGULATION NO. 511/2014−PECULIARITIES FOR AGRICULTURE,
SCIENTIFIC PAPERS-SERIES MANAGEMENT
ECONOMIC ENGINEERING IN AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, 18: 293−301.
WOS:000454318300039
246) Santoso,
WY, 2016. BRIDGING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NAGOYA-KUALA LUMPUR
SUPPLEMENTARY PROTOCOL ON LIABILITY AND REDRESS IN INDONESIA,
INDONESIA LAW REVIEW, 6: 58−78.
DOI: 10.15742/ilrev.v6n1.169. WOS:000448080800004
247) Sava, CS;
Antofie, MM, 2019. Bioprospecting Wild Biodiversity in Romania: Case
Study−Gentiana lutea, ROMANIAN
BIOTECHNOLOGICAL LETTERS, 24: 129−139. DOI: 10.25083/rbl/24.1/129.139.
WOS:000463708100015
248) Savaresi,
A, 2013. REDD plus and Human Rights: Addressing Synergies between
International Regimes, ECOLOGY AND
SOCIETY, 18: −. DOI: 10.5751/ES-05549-180305. WOS:000325521300011
249) Savaresi,
A, 2013. Chapter 2. The International Human Rights Law Implications of
the Nagoya Protocol, 2010 NAGOYA
PROTOCOL ON ACCESS AND BENEFIT-SHARING IN PERSPECTIVE: IMPLICATIONS FOR
INTERNATIONAL LAW AND IMPLEMENTATION CHALLENGES, 1: 53−81.
WOS:000338877200003
250) Schacht,
H, 2014. The Recent EC Draft Concerning the Nagoya Protocol: Challenges
for the Industry with a Special Regard to the Pharmaceutical Sector,
BIOTECHNOLOGY LAW REPORT, 33: 115−119. DOI: 10.1089/blr.2014.9992.
WOS:000337915900006
251) Schindel,
DE; Du Plessis, P, 2014. Reap the benefits of the Nagoya Protocol,
NATURE, 515: 37−37. DOI: 10.1038/515037a. WOS:000344187500018
252) Schindel,
DE; Bubela, T; Rosenthal, J; Castle, D; du Plessis, P; Bye, R, 2015. The
New Age of the Nagoya Protocol,
NATURE CONSERVATION-BULGARIA, : 43−56. DOI:
10.3897/natureconservation.12.5412. WOS:000361405100003
253)
Schoenberg, PL, 2009. A Polarizing Dilemma: Assessing Potential
Regulatory Gap-Filling Measures for Arctic and Antarctic Marine Genetic
Resource Access and Benefit Sharing,
CORNELL INTERNATIONAL LAW JOURNAL, 42: 271−299. WOS:000272508600006
254)
Schroeder, D; Chennells, R; Louw, C; Snyders, L; Hodges, T, 2020. The
Rooibos Benefit Sharing Agreement-Breaking New Ground with Respect, Honesty,
Fairness, and Care, CAMBRIDGE
QUARTERLY OF HEALTHCARE ETHICS, 29: 285−301. DOI:
10.1017/S0963180119001075. WOS:000524929100012
255) Schulz,
T; Hufty, M; Tschopp, M, 2017. Small and smart: the role of Switzerland
in the Cartagena and Nagoya protocols negotiations,
INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL
AGREEMENTS-POLITICS LAW AND ECONOMICS, 17: 553−571. DOI:
10.1007/s10784-016-9334-9. WOS:000404993800006
256) Segger,
MCC; Phillips, FK, 2015. Indigenous traditional knowledge for
sustainable development: the biodiversity convention and plant treaty
regimes, JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 20: 430−437. DOI:
10.1007/s10310-015-0498-x. WOS:000360863200003
257) Seifert,
H; Weber, M; Glockner, FO; Kostadinov, I, 2020. An open-source
GIS-enabled lookup service for Nagoya Protocol party information,
DATABASE-THE JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL DATABASES AND CURATION, : 1−6.
DOI: 10.1093/database/baaa014. WOS:000527706800001
258) Seiler,
A; Dutfield, G, 2002. Regulating access and benefit sharing,
BIOTECHNOLOGY AND DEVELOPMENT MONITOR, : 2−7. WOS:000175515000002
259)
Siebenhuner, B; Suplie, J, 2005. Implementing the access and
benefit-sharing provisions of the CBD: A case for institutional learning,
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 53:
507−522. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.10.012. WOS:000230162400006
260)
Siebenhuner, B; Dedeurwaerdere, T; Brousseau, E, 2005. Introduction and
overview to the special issue on biodiversity conservation, access and
benefit-sharing and traditional knowledge,
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 53:
439−444. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.12.012. WOS:000230162400001
261) Sikor, T;
Martin, A; Fisher, J; He, J, 2014. Toward an Empirical Analysis of
Justice in Ecosystem Governance,
CONSERVATION LETTERS, 7: 524−532. DOI: 10.1111/conl.12142.
WOS:000346914400004
262)
Silvestri, LC, 2017. Nagoya Protocol: Challenges Arising from a Complex,
Ambiguous and Controversial Text,
ANUARIO MEXICANO DE DERECHO INTERNACIONAL, 17: 697−716.
WOS:000435609700020
263)
Silvestri, L, 2017. What to consider and why when developing access and
benefit-sharing regimes?, AUGMDOMUS,
9: 1−16. WOS:000502824900001
264)
Silvestri, L; Sosa, A; Mc Kay, F; Vitorino, MD; Hill, M; Zachariades, C;
Hight, S; Weyl, P; Smith, D; Djeddour, D; Mason, PG, 2020.
Implementation of access and benefit-sharing measures has consequences for
classical biological control of weeds,
BIOCONTROL, 65: 125−141. DOI:
10.1007/s10526-019-09988-4. WOS:000520211100001
265) Sirakaya,
A, 2019. Balanced Options for Access and Benefit-Sharing: Stakeholder
Insights on Provider Country Legislation,
FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 10:
−. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01175. WOS:000497561100001
266) Sirakaya,
A, 2020. A balanced ABS system: Stakeholder perception on ABS goals,
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, : −. DOI: 10.1002/sd.2040.
WOS:000508895600001
267) Skirycz,
A; Kierszniowska, S; Meret, M; Willmitzer, L; Tzotzos, G, 2016.
Medicinal Bioprospecting of the Amazon Rainforest: A Modern Eldorado ?,
TRENDS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY, 34: 781−790. DOI:
10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.03.006. WOS:000384856500004
268) Smith, D;
Buddie, AG; Goss, RJM; Overmann, J; Lepleux, C; Bronstrup, M; Kloaregs, B;
Meiners, T; Brennecke, P; Ianora, A; Bouget, FY; Gribbon, P; Pina, M, 2019.
Discovery pipelines for marine resources: an ocean of opportunity for
biotechnology?, WORLD JOURNAL OF
MICROBIOLOGY & BIOTECHNOLOGY, 35: −. DOI: 10.1007/s11274-019-2685-y.
WOS:000474497900004
269) Smith, D;
Ryan, M, 2019. International postal, quarantine and safety regulations,
MICROBIOLOGY AUSTRALIA, 40: 117−120. DOI: 10.1071/MA19032.
WOS:000489065800008
270) Smith, D,
2017. Practical and Implementable Mechanisms for Compliance with the
Nagoya Protocol: Access and Benefit Sharing,
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 5TH INTERNATIONAL
SYMPOSIUM ON BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF ARTHROPODS, : 67−70.
WOS:000461868100020
271) Smith, D;
da Silva, M; Jackson, J; Lyal, C, 2017. Explanation of the Nagoya
Protocol on Access and Benefit Sharing and its implication for microbiology,
MICROBIOLOGY-SGM, 163: 289−296. DOI: 10.1099/mic.0.000425.
WOS:000400276500001
272) Smith, D;
Hinz, H; Mulema, J; Weyl, P; Ryan, MJ, 2018. Biological control and the
Nagoya Protocol on access and benefit sharing−a case of effective due
diligence, BIOCONTROL SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY, 28: 914−926. DOI: 10.1080/09583157.2018.1460317.
WOS:000446576200002
273) Smyth,
SJ; Macall, DM; Phillips, PWB; de Beer, J, 2020. Implications of
biological information digitization: Access and benefit sharing of plant
genetic resources, JOURNAL OF WORLD
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, 23: 267−287. DOI: 10.1111/jwip.12151.
WOS:000520268300001
274) Snyder,
S, 2011. Protecting Biological Diversity: The Effectiveness of Access
and Benefit-sharing Regimes, GLOBAL
ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 11: 156−158. DOI: 10.1162/GLEP_r_00075.
WOS:000293040500015
275) Soares,
J, 2011. The Nagoya Protocol and Natural Product-Based Research,
ACS CHEMICAL BIOLOGY, 6: 289−289. DOI: 10.1021/cb200089w.
WOS:000289455400001
276) Song, MJ;
Kim, H; Heldenbrand, B; Jeon, J; Lee, S, 2013. Ethnopharmacological
survey of medicinal plants in Jeju Island, Korea,
JOURNAL OF ETHNOBIOLOGY AND
ETHNOMEDICINE, 9: −. DOI: 10.1186/1746-4269-9-48. WOS:000321930900001
277) Souza,
ALG; Santos, AA; da Silva, GF, 2017. THE "ROYALTIES" OF TECHNOLOGICAL
APPLICATIONS OF NATIONAL GENETIC PATRIMONY AND ASSOCIATED TRADITIONAL
KNOWLEDGE: THE BRAZILIAN STATE IN QUESTION,
REVISTA GEINTEC-GESTAO INOVACAO E
TECNOLOGIAS, 7: 4149−4158. DOI: 10.7198/geintec.v7.i4.1251.
WOS:000419450000010
278)
Spellerberg, B, 2017. Current development of the German Gene Bank for
Ornamental Plants, ZWEITES SYMPOSIUM
ZIERPFLANZENZUCHTUNG, 2017, 457: 15−17. DOI: 10.5073/jka.2017.457.001.
WOS:000414274800001
279)
Sreedharan, SK, 2010. Bridging the Time and Tide-Traditional Knowledge
in the 21(st) Century, JOURNAL OF
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS, 15: 146−150. WOS:000277069500005
280) Srinivas,
KR, 2017. Regimes in Conflict? Controversies over Access and Benefit
Sharing and Sharing of Virus Samples,
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RISK REGULATION, 8: 573−579. DOI:
10.1017/err.2017.47. WOS:000413168600006
281)
Stangeland, T; Dhillion, SS; Reksten, H, 2008. Recognition and
development of traditional medicine in Tanzania,
JOURNAL OF ETHNOPHARMACOLOGY, 117:
290−299. DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2008.02.008. WOS:000256207700013
282) Staral,
JM; Sekerak, JA, 2012. FIGHTING BIOPIRACY AT THE SOURCE: SENSITIZING
INDIGENOUS COMMUNITIES TO WESTERNIZED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS AND THE
THREAT OF BIOPIRACY, INTED2012:
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE, :
6381−6390. WOS:000326396406049
283) Strand,
J; Thomsen, H; Jensen, JB; Marcussen, C; Nicolajsen, TB; Skriver, MB;
Sogaard, IM; Ezaz, T; Purup, S; Callesen, H; Pertoldi, C, 2020.
Biobanking in amphibian and reptilian conservation and management:
opportunities and challenges,
CONSERVATION GENETICS RESOURCES, : −. DOI: 10.1007/s12686-020-01142-y.
WOS:000519502700001
284) Suiseeya,
KRM, 2014. Negotiating the Nagoya Protocol: Indigenous Demands for
Justice, GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL
POLITICS, 14: 102−. DOI: 10.1162/GLEP_a_00241. WOS:000340021100006
285)
Sutherland, LA; Shepheard, ML, 2017. IMPLEMENTING ACCESS AND BENEFIT
SHARING FOR SEED BANKING, ANNALS OF
THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN, 102: 386−396. DOI: 10.3417/D-16-00002A.
WOS:000407683300022
286) Swenson,
U; Munzinger, J, 2016. Five new species and a systematic synopsis of
Pycnandra (Sapotaceae), the largest endemic genus in New Caledonia,
AUSTRALIAN SYSTEMATIC BOTANY, 29: 1−40. DOI: 10.1071/SB16001.
WOS:000380133200002
287) Sybesma,
W; Rohde, C; Bardy, P; Pirnay, JP; Cooper, I; Caplin, J; Chanishvili, N;
Coffey, A; De Vos, D; Scholz, AH; McCallin, S; Puschner, HM; Pantucek, R;
Aminov, R; Doskar, J; Kurtboke, DI, 2018. Silk Route to the Acceptance
and Re-Implementation of Bacteriophage Therapy-Part II,
ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL, 7: −. DOI:
10.3390/antibiotics7020035. WOS:000436484700009
288) Talaat,
WIAW, 2013. Protection of the Associated Traditional Knowledge on
Genetic Resources: Beyond the Nagoya Protocol,
PSU-USM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON
HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES, 91: 673−678. DOI:
10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.468. WOS:000348252800074
289) Tamminen,
S, 2015. Changing values of farm animal genomic resources. from
historical breeds to the Nagoya Protocol,
FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 6: −. DOI:
10.3389/fgene.2015.00279. WOS:000366907600001
290) Tay, D,
2005. Ornamental plant genetic resources conservation and utilization in
the Convention on Biological Diversity era,
Proceedings of the Vth International
Symposium on New Floricultural Crops, : 233−242. DOI:
10.17660/ActaHortic.2005.683.27. WOS:000231867400027
291) Teran,
MY, 2016. The Nagoya Protocol and Indigenous Peoples,
INTERNATIONAL INDIGENOUS POLICY
JOURNAL, 7: −. DOI: 10.18584/iipj.2016.7.2.6. WOS:000383961600006
292) Thormann,
I; Engels, JMM; Halewood, M, 2019. Are the old International Board for
Plant Genetic Resources (IBPGR) base collections available through the Plant
Treaty's multilateral system of access and benefit sharing? A review,
GENETIC RESOURCES AND CROP EVOLUTION,
66: 291−310. DOI: 10.1007/s10722-018-0715-5. WOS:000457581200001
293)
Timmermann, BN; Wachter, G; Valcic, S; Hutchinson, B; Casler, C; Henzel, J;
Ram, S; Currim, F; Manak, R; Franzblau, S; Maiese, W; Galinis, D; Suarez, E;
Fortunato, R; Saavedra, E; Bye, R; Mata, R; Montenegro, G, 1999. The
Latin American ICBG: The first five years,
PHARMACEUTICAL BIOLOGY, 37:
35−54. DOI: 10.1076/1388-0209(200010)37:SUP;1-W;FT035. WOS:000165402200004
294) Tindall,
B. J., 2020. Clarification of access regulations to genetic resources
that are subject to the sovereign rights of sovereign states and the deposit
of nomenclatural types under the International Code of Nomenclature of
Prokaryotes, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF
SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY, 70: 317−320. DOI:
10.1099/ijsem.0.003754. WOS:000514419600045
295) Touroult,
J; Pollet, M; Pascal, O, 2018. Overview of Mitaraka survey: research
frame, study site and field protocols,
ZOOSYSTEMA, 40: 327−365. DOI:
10.5252/zoosystema2018v40a13. WOS:000454155600001
296)
Trommetter, M, 2005. Biodiversity and international stakes: A question
of access, ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 53:
573−583. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.11.017. WOS:000230162400010
297)
Tsioumani, E, 2018. Beyond access and benefit-sharing: Lessons from the
law and governance of agricultural biodiversity,
JOURNAL OF WORLD INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY, 21: 106−122. DOI: 10.1111/jwip.12094. WOS:000436807300001
298) van de
Wiel, CCM; Schaart, JG; Lotz, LAP; Smulders, MJM, 2017. New traits in
crops produced by genome editing techniques based on deletions,
PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGY REPORTS, 11:
1−8. DOI: 10.1007/s11816-017-0425-z. WOS:000397080700001
299) van
Lenteren, JC, 2012. The state of commercial augmentative biological
control: plenty of natural enemies, but a frustrating lack of uptake,
BIOCONTROL, 57: 1−20. DOI:
10.1007/s10526-011-9395-1. WOS:000299327400001
300) van
Lenteren, JC; Cock, MJW; Brodeur, J; Barratt, BIP; Bigler, F; Bolckmans, K;
Haas, F; Mason, PG; Parra, JRP, 2011. Will the Convention on Biological
Diversity put an end to biological control?,
REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ENTOMOLOGIA, 55:
1−5. DOI: 10.1590/S0085-56262011000100001. WOS:000289592800001
301) van
Niekerk, J; Wynberg, R, 2012. The trade in Pelargonium sidoides: Rural
livelihood relief or bounty for the 'bio-buccaneers'?,
DEVELOPMENT SOUTHERN AFRICA, 29:
530−547. DOI: 10.1080/0376835X.2012.715440. WOS:000308703700003
302) van
Zonneveld, M; Loo, J; Maselli, S; Madrid, JJ; Echeverria, JL, 2018.
Bridging molecular genetics and participatory research: how access and
benefit-sharing stimulate interdisciplinary research for tropical biology
and conservation, BIOTROPICA, 50:
178−186. DOI: 10.1111/btp.12515. WOS:000419881900019
303)
Vanheusden, B; Van den Berghe, G, 2017. The Implementation of 'Access
and Benefit-sharing' in Five EU Member States: The Achievements and
Deficiencies of the Nagoya Protocol and the eu Regulation 511/2014,
JOURNAL FOR EUROPEAN ENVIRONMENTAL &
PLANNING LAW, 14: 7−40. DOI: 10.1163/18760104-01401003.
WOS:000399983800002
304)
Velho-Pereira, S; Kamat, NM, 2013. Actinobacteriological research in
India, INDIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY, 51: 573−596.
WOS:000322856500001
305)
Venkataraman, K, 2009. India's Biodiversity Act 2002 and its role in
conservation, TROPICAL ECOLOGY, 50:
23−30. WOS:000268913200004
306) Verkley,
G; Stadler, M; Luangsa-ard, J; Crous, PW, 2015. HOW WILL THE NAGOYA
PROTOCOL AFFECT OUR DAILY WORK?, IMA
FUNGUS, 6: −. WOS:000209909000002
307) Vindigni,
G; La Terra, G; Bellia, C, 2017. THE COMPLEX FRAMEWORK OF ACCESS AND
BENEFIT SHARING UNDER THE INTERNATIONAL POLICY ARENA,
QUALITY-ACCESS TO SUCCESS, 18:
468−472. WOS:000417405300086
308) Visser,
B, 2016. GPL 1: Why and how did the Nagoya Protocol evolve?,
6TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM BREEDING RESEARCH ON MEDICINAL AND AROMATIC
PLANTS (BREEDMAP 6), 453: 97−97. DOI: 10.5073/jka.2016.453.032.
WOS:000385324200032
309)
Voigt-Hanssen, G, 2018. Current 'Light' and 'Heavy' Options for
Benefit-sharing in the Context of the United Nations Convention on the Law
of the Sea, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MARINE AND COASTAL LAW, 33: 683−705. DOI:
10.1163/15718085-12334012. WOS:000457322100002
310) Watanabe,
ME, 2015. The Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit Sharing,
BIOSCIENCE, 65: 543−550. DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biv056.
WOS:000355779400003
311) Watanabe,
M, 2015. The Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit Sharing (vol 65, pg
543, 2015), BIOSCIENCE, 65:
644−644. WOS:000357845600004
312) Welch,
EW, 2012. Potential implications of the Nagoya Protocol for the
livestock sector, JOURNAL OF ANIMAL
BREEDING AND GENETICS, 129: 423−424. DOI: 10.1111/jbg.12013.
WOS:000311054200001
313) Welch,
EW; Shin, E; Long, J, 2013. Potential effects of the Nagoya Protocol on
the exchange of non-plant genetic resources for scientific research: Actors,
paths, and consequences, ECOLOGICAL
ECONOMICS, 86: 136−147. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.11.019.
WOS:000317803500015
314) Wilke, M,
2013. Chapter 4. A Healthy Look at the Nagoya Protocol-Implications for
Global Health Governance, 2010 NAGOYA
PROTOCOL ON ACCESS AND BENEFIT-SHARING IN PERSPECTIVE: IMPLICATIONS FOR
INTERNATIONAL LAW AND IMPLEMENTATION CHALLENGES, 1: 123−148.
WOS:000338877200005
315) Willcox,
M; Diallo, D; Sanogo, R; Giani, S; Graz, B; Falquet, J; Bodeker, G, 2015.
Intellectual property rights, benefit-sharing and development of "improved
traditional medicines": A new approach,
JOURNAL OF ETHNOPHARMACOLOGY, 176:
281−285. DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2015.10.041. WOS:000367106600023
316) Williams,
M, 2015. Global Governance of Genetic Resources: Access and Benefit
Sharing after the Nagoya Protocol,
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 15: 187−190. DOI: 10.1162/GLEP_r_00320.
WOS:000358733800012
317) Wilson,
D; Keith, G; Harpal, B; Ram, S; Fabien, D; Agnieszka, W; Toru, T, 2017.
Therapy through Social Medicine: Cultivating Connections and Inspiring
Solutions for Healthy Living, AIMS
MEDICAL SCIENCE, 4: 131−150. DOI: 10.3934/medsci.2017.2.131.
WOS:000404475600001
318) Winge, T,
2016. Linking access and benefit-sharing for crop genetic resources to
climate change adaptation, PLANT
GENETIC RESOURCES-CHARACTERIZATION AND UTILIZATION, 14: 11−27. DOI:
10.1017/S1479262114001038. WOS:000369415100002
319) Wynberg,
R; Laird, SA, 2018. Fast Science and Sluggish Policy: The Herculean Task
of Regulating Biodiscovery, TRENDS IN
BIOTECHNOLOGY, 36: 1−3. DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2017.09.002.
WOS:000418534800001
320) Wynberg,
R, 2017. Making sense of access and benefit sharing in the rooibos
industry: Towards a holistic, just and sustainable framing,
SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 110:
39−51. DOI: 10.1016/j.sajb.2016.09.015. WOS:000400533600004
321) Wynberg,
R; Laird, S; van Niekerk, J; Kozanayi, W, 2015. Formalization of the
Natural Product Trade in Southern Africa: Unintended Consequences and Policy
Blurring in Biotrade and Bioprospecting,
SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 28:
559−574. DOI: 10.1080/08941920.2015.1014604. WOS:000354104300007
322) Xiao, N;
Ahagon, N; Kubo, Y; Morioka, H, 2018. Preparing for the new age of the
Nagoya Protocol in scientific ocean drilling,
SCIENTIFIC DRILLING, 24: 51−59.
DOI: 10.5194/sd-24-51-2018. WOS:000447838900004
323) Yea, SJ;
Jang, Y; Seong, B; Kim, C, 2015. Comparative analysis of web search
trends between experts and public for medicinal herbs in Korea,
JOURNAL OF ETHNOPHARMACOLOGY, 176:
463−468. DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2015.11.027. WOS:000367106600042
324) Yea, SJ;
Seong, B; Jang, Y; Kim, C, 2016. A data mining approach to selecting
herbs with similar efficacy: Targeted selection methods based on medical
subject headings (MeSH), JOURNAL OF
ETHNOPHARMACOLOGY, 182: 27−34. DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2016.02.007.
WOS:000373411100004
325) Yea, SJ;
Kim, C; Kim, I; Sung, B, 2014. Picking out herbs with analogous efficacy
based on MeSH semantic similarity,
2014 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOINFORMATICS AND BIOMEDICINE (BIBM),
: −. WOS:000377412300091
326) Young,
TR, 2013. An International Cooperation Perspective on the Implementation
of the Nagoya Protocol, 2010 NAGOYA
PROTOCOL ON ACCESS AND BENEFIT-SHARING IN PERSPECTIVE: IMPLICATIONS FOR
INTERNATIONAL LAW AND IMPLEMENTATION CHALLENGES, 1: 451−505.
WOS:000338877200016
327) Yu, CX,
2020. Implications of the UNCLOS Marine Scientific Research Regime for
the Current Negotiations on Access and Benefit Sharing of Marine Genetic
Resources in Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction,
OCEAN DEVELOPMENT AND INTERNATIONAL
LAW, 51: 2−18. DOI: 10.1080/00908320.2019.1677018. WOS:000493532900001
328) Yurkov,
A; Puschner, HM; Scholz, AH, 2019. DSMZ: the European Union's first
Registered Collection under the Nagoya Protocol,
MICROBIOLOGY AUSTRALIA, 40:
108−113. DOI: 10.1071/MA19030. WOS:000489065800006
329) Zainol,
ZA; Amin, L; Akpoviri, F; Ramli, R, 2011. Biopiracy and states'
sovereignty over their biological resources,
AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY, 10:
12395−12408. WOS:000298540000004
330) Zheng,
XO, 2019. Key legal challenges and opportunities in the implementation
of the Nagoya Protocol: The case of China,
REVIEW OF EUROPEAN COMPARATIVE &
INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW, 28: 175−184. DOI: 10.1111/reel.12282.
WOS:000474672300006
331) Zidorn,
C, 2019. Bioprospecting of plant natural products in Schleswig-Holstein
(Germany) I: chemodiversity of the Cichorieae tribe (Asteraceae) in
Schleswig-Holstein, PHYTOCHEMISTRY
REVIEWS, 18: 1223−1253. DOI: 10.1007/s11101-019-09609-z.
WOS:000496695300013