1) [Anonymous], 2014. Nagoya Protocol takes effect-without Japan, NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 32: 1176−1176. DOI: 10.1038/nbt1214-1176c. WOS:000346156800008

2) Adebola, T, 2019. Examining plant variety protection in Nigeria: Realities, obligations and prospects, JOURNAL OF WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, 22: 36−58. DOI: 10.1111/jwip.12113. WOS:000460938200003

3) Adebola, T, 2019. Access and benefit sharing, farmers' rights and plant breeders' rights: reflections on the African Model Law, QUEEN MARY JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, 9: 105−121. DOI: 10.4337/qmjip.2019.01.06. WOS:000457492800007

4) Aerts, R; Geeraert, L; Berecha, G; Hundera, K; Muys, B; De Kort, H; Honnay, O, 2017. Conserving wild Arabica coffee: Emerging threats and opportunities, AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 237: 75−79. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2016.12.023. WOS:000393252200008

5) Albert, H, 2014. Biodiversity Europe will implement the Nagoya Protocol, BIOFUTUR, : 21−21. WOS:000338900900047

6) Ameha, A; Nielsen, OJ; Larsen, HO, 2014. Impacts of access and benefit sharing on livelihoods and forest: Case of participatory forest management in Ethiopia, ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 97: 162−171. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.11.011. WOS:000331480200018

7) Amengual, J; Alvarez-Berastegui, D, 2018. A critical evaluation of the Aichi Biodiversity Target 11 and the Mediterranean MPA network, two years ahead of its deadline, BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 225: 187−196. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.06.032. WOS:000442003900019

8) Andriantahina, F; Liu, XL; Feng, TT; Xiang, JH, 2013. Current Status of Genetics and Genomics of Reared Penaeid Shrimp: Information Relevant to Access and Benefit Sharing, MARINE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 15: 399−412. DOI: 10.1007/s10126-013-9500-9. WOS:000321101800002

9) Angerer, K, 2011. Frog tales−on poison dart frogs, epibatidine, and the sharing of biodiversity, INNOVATION-THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH, 24: 353−369. DOI: 10.1080/13511610.2011.592061. WOS:000299230500009


11) Appleby, T; Kinsey, S; Wheeler, B; Cunningham, E, 2016. The marine biology of law and human health, JOURNAL OF THE MARINE BIOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED KINGDOM, 96: 19−27. DOI: 10.1017/S0025315415000909. WOS:000371158300004


13) Atsali, SS, 2004. Discussion paper−International regime on access and benefit-sharing (ABS): Exploring new options for achieving CBD-related ABS objectives, International Expert Workshop on Access to Genetic Resources and Benefit Sharing, Record of Discussion, : 121−124. WOS:000243638100013

14) Austin, BJ; Robinson, CJ; Tofa, M; Garnett, ST, 2019. Investor aspirations for Indigenous land and sea management in Australia, AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 26: 156−172. DOI: 10.1080/14486563.2019.1579002. WOS:000474684300005

15) Aviles-Polanco, G; Jefferson, DJ; Almendarez-Hernandez, MA; Beltran-Morales, LF, 2019. Factors That Explain the Utilization of the Nagoya Protocol Framework for Access and Benefit Sharing, SUSTAINABILITY, 11: −. DOI: 10.3390/su11205550. WOS:000498398900007


17) Barpujari, I; Sarma, UK, 2017. Traditional Knowledge in the Time of Neo-Liberalism: Access and Benefit-Sharing Regimes in India and Bhutan, INTERNATIONAL INDIGENOUS POLICY JOURNAL, 8: −. DOI: 10.18584/iipj.2017.8.1.3. WOS:000396720900005

18) Barratt, BIP; Mason, PG; Cock, MJW; Klapwijk, J; Van Lenteren, JC; Brodeur, J; Hoelmer, KA; Heimpel, GE, 2017. Access and Benefit Sharing: Best Practices for the Use and Exchange of Invertebrate Biological Control Agents, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 5TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF ARTHROPODS, : 71−74. WOS:000461868100021

19) Barratt, BIP; Moran, VC; Bigler, F; van Lenteren, JC, 2018. The status of biological control and recommendations for improving uptake for the future, BIOCONTROL, 63: 155−167. DOI: 10.1007/s10526-017-9831-y. WOS:000422647200012

20) Bartels, P; Kotze, A, 2006. Wildlife biomaterial banking in Africa for now and the future, JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING, 8: 779−781. DOI: 10.1039/b602809h. WOS:000239640000002

21) Bartley, DM; Nguyen, TTT; Halwart, M; De Silva, SS, 2009. Use and exchange of aquatic genetic resources in aquaculture: information relevant to access and benefit sharing, REVIEWS IN AQUACULTURE, 1: 157−162. DOI: 10.1111/j.1753-5131.2009.01009.x. WOS:000284763400001

22) Bavikatte, KS; Bennett, T, 2015. Community stewardship: the foundation of biocultural rights, JOURNAL OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 6: 7−29. DOI: 10.4337/jhre.2015.01.01. WOS:000442822100002

23) Beck, E, 2019. Access and benefit sharing-The perspective of basic research, PHYTOMEDICINE, 53: 302−307. DOI: 10.1016/j.phymed.2018.10.018. WOS:000459935700033

24) Becker, P; Bosschaerts, M; Chaerle, P; Daniel, HM; Hellemans, A; Olbrechts, A; Rigouts, L; Wilmotte, A; Hendrickx, M, 2019. Public Microbial Resource Centers: Key Hubs for Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable (FAIR) Microorganisms and Genetic Materials, APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 85: −. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01444-19. WOS:000490946700016

25) Bhatia, P; Chugh, A, 2015. Role of marine bioprospecting contracts in developing access and benefit sharing mechanism for marine traditional knowledge holders in the pharmaceutical, GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 3: 176−187. DOI: 10.1016/j.gecco.2014.11.015. WOS:000416220000016

26) Bigler, F, 2010. Does the convention on biological diversity impede biological control?, AGRARFORSCHUNG SCHWEIZ, 1: 134−141. WOS:000278044000003

27) Birhanu, FM, 2010. Challenges and prospects of implementing the access and benefit sharing regime of the Convention on Biological Diversity in Africa: the case of Ethiopia, INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL AGREEMENTS-POLITICS LAW AND ECONOMICS, 10: 249−266. DOI: 10.1007/s10784-010-9122-x. WOS:000280795600005

28) Blackburn, HD; Plante, Y; Rohrer, G; Welch, EW; Paiva, SR, 2014. Impact of genetic drift on access and benefit sharing under the Nagoya Protocol: The case of the Meishan pig, JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 92: 1405−1411. DOI: 10.2527/jas.2013-7274. WOS:000333581900014

29) Blackmore, A, 2017. Selective breeding and the intensive management of wildlife: a legal challenge for Namibian conservation, AFRICAN JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE RESEARCH, 47: 65−78. DOI: 10.3957/056.047.0065. WOS:000422940000001

30) Blasiak, R; Jouffray, JB; Wabnitz, CCC; Sundstrom, E; Osterblom, H, 2018. Corporate control and global governance of marine genetic resources, SCIENCE ADVANCES, 4: −. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aar5237. WOS:000443175500029

31) Bodeker, G; van’t Klooster, C; Weisbord, E, 2014. Prunus africana (Hook.f.) Kalkman: The Overexploitation of a Medicinal Plant Species and Its Legal Context, JOURNAL OF ALTERNATIVE AND COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE, 20: 810−822. DOI: 10.1089/acm.2013.0459. WOS:000345684500002

32) Bohm, M; Collen, B, 2015. Toward equality of biodiversity knowledge through technology transfer, CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 29: 1290−1302. DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12529. WOS:000363729100005

33) Bonsch, A, 2017. The Nagoya Protocol consequences for plant breeding, ZWEITES SYMPOSIUM ZIERPFLANZENZUCHTUNG, 2017, 457: 32−35. DOI: 10.5073/jka.457.2017.005. WOS:000414274800004

34) Bose, M; Dutta, A, 2015. Inequity in hospitalization care: a study on utilization of healthcare services in West Bengal, India, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY AND MANAGEMENT-IJHPM, 4: 29−38. DOI: 10.15171/ijhpm.2015.05. WOS:000378652500005

35) Boundy-Mills, KL; Glantschnig, E; Roberts, IN; Yurkov, A; Casaregola, S; Daniel, HM; Groenewald, M; Turchetti, B, 2016. Yeast culture collections in the twenty-first century: new opportunities and challenges, YEAST, 33: 243−260. DOI: 10.1002/yea.3171. WOS:000380255000002

36) Bourdy, G; Aubertin, C; Jullian, V; Deharo, E, 2017. Quassia "biopiracy" case and the Nagoya Protocol: A researcher's perspective, JOURNAL OF ETHNOPHARMACOLOGY, 206: 290−297. DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2017.05.030. WOS:000406564500029

37) Bretting, PK, 2007. The US national Plant Germplasm System in an era of shifting international norms for germplasm exchange, PROCEEDINGS OF THE SECOND INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON PLANT GENETIC RESOURCES OF HORTICULTURAL CROPS, VOLS 1 AND 2, : 55−. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2007.760.5. WOS:000252298000005

38) Brink, M; van Hintum, T, 2020. Genebank Operation in the Arena of Access and Benefit-Sharing Policies, FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 10: −. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01712. WOS:000511378500001

39) Broggiato, A; Arnaud-Haond, S; Chiarolla, C; Greiber, T, 2014. Fair and equitable sharing of benefits from the utilization of marine genetic resources in areas beyond national jurisdiction: Bridging the gaps between science and policy, MARINE POLICY, 49: 176−185. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2014.02.012. WOS:000338607800022

40) Brush, SB, 2007. Farmers' Rights and protection of traditional agricultural knowledge, WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 35: 1499−1514. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2006.05.018. WOS:000250023700003

41) Burton, G; Evans-Illidge, EA, 2014. Emerging R and D Law: The Nagoya Protocol and Its Implications for Researchers, ACS CHEMICAL BIOLOGY, 9: 588−591. DOI: 10.1021/cb500045t. WOS:000333477300002

42) Burton, J, 2012. ACCESS AND BENEFIT SHARING: Policy and Legal Implications for Papua New Guinea, PACIFIC AFFAIRS, 85: 874−875. WOS:000311765200046

43) Burton, G, 2013. Implementation of the Nagoya Protocol in Juscanz Countries: The Unlikely Lot, 2010 NAGOYA PROTOCOL ON ACCESS AND BENEFIT-SHARING IN PERSPECTIVE: IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERNATIONAL LAW AND IMPLEMENTATION CHALLENGES, 1: 295−329. WOS:000338877200011

44) Buyx, AM; Tait, J, 2011. Biofuels: ethics and policy-making, BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR, 5: 631−639. DOI: 10.1002/bbb.325. WOS:000297013500014

45) Camara-Leret, R; Paniagua-Zambrana, N; Svenning, JC; Balslev, H; Macia, MJ, 2014. Geospatial patterns in traditional knowledge serve in assessing intellectual property rights and benefit-sharing in northwest South America, JOURNAL OF ETHNOPHARMACOLOGY, 158: 58−65. DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2014.10.009. WOS:000348084600008

46) Candeira, AL; Silvestri, L, 2013. Chapter 9. Challenges in the Implementation of the Nagoya Protocol from the Perspective of a Member State of the European Union: The Case of Spain, 2010 NAGOYA PROTOCOL ON ACCESS AND BENEFIT-SHARING IN PERSPECTIVE: IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERNATIONAL LAW AND IMPLEMENTATION CHALLENGES, 1: 269−294. WOS:000338877200010

47) Cardellino, RA; Boyazoglu, J, 2009. Research opportunities in the field of animal genetic resources, LIVESTOCK SCIENCE, 120: 166−173. DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2008.07.002. WOS:000263322600002

48) Chiarolla, C, 2013. The Role of Private International Law under the Nagoya Protocol, 2010 NAGOYA PROTOCOL ON ACCESS AND BENEFIT-SHARING IN PERSPECTIVE: IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERNATIONAL LAW AND IMPLEMENTATION CHALLENGES, 1: 423−449. WOS:000338877200015

49) Chiarolla, C, 2014. Intellectual property rights and benefit sharing from marine genetic resources in areas beyond national jurisdiction: current discussions and regulatory options, QUEEN MARY JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, 4: 171−194. DOI: 10.4337/qmjip.2014.03.01. WOS:000340347900002

50) Chiarolla, C; Louafi, S; Schloen, M, 2013. Chapter 3. An Analysis of the Relationship between the Nagoya Protocol and Instruments related to Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture and Farmers' Rights, 2010 NAGOYA PROTOCOL ON ACCESS AND BENEFIT-SHARING IN PERSPECTIVE: IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERNATIONAL LAW AND IMPLEMENTATION CHALLENGES, 1: 83−122. WOS:000338877200004

51) Cho, AY, 2017. Practical Implementation Issues for the Convention on Biological Diversity and the Nagoya Protocol from a Korean Perspective, KOREAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL AND COMPARATIVE LAW, 5: 61−82. DOI: 10.1163/22134484-12340079. WOS:000408760500004

52) Christmann, S, 2019. Under which conditions would a wide support be likely for a Multilateral Environmental Agreement for pollinator protection?, ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 91: 1−5. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.10.004. WOS:000452343200001

53) Cifuentes, GE, 2015. FAO TREATY CONTRIBUTIONS: THE CREATION OF AN INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM ON ACCESS AND BENEFIT SHARING, JURIDICAS CUC, 11: 73−100. DOI: 10.17981/juridcuc.11.1.2015.4. WOS:000379553600005

54) Cock, MJW; van Lenteren, JC; Brodeur, J; Barratt, BIP; Bigler, F; Bolckmans, K; Consoli, FL; Haas, F; Mason, PG; Parra, JRP, 2010. Do new Access and Benefit Sharing procedures under the Convention on Biological Diversity threaten the future of biological control?, BIOCONTROL, 55: 199−218. DOI: 10.1007/s10526-009-9234-9. WOS:000275536500001

55) Comizzoli, P; Holt, WV, 2016. Implications of the Nagoya Protocol for genome resource banks composed of biomaterials from rare and endangered species, REPRODUCTION FERTILITY AND DEVELOPMENT, 28: 1145−1151. DOI: 10.1071/RD15429. WOS:000378930400012

56) Coolsaet, B; Pitseys, J, 2015. Fair and Equitable Negotiations? African Influence and the International Access and Benefit-Sharing Regime, GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 15: 38−. DOI: 10.1162/GLEP_a_00297. WOS:000354114300004

57) Coutinot, D; Briano, J; Parra, JRP; de Sa, LAN; Consoli, FL, 2013. Exchange of Natural Enemies for Biological Control: Is it a Rocky Road?-The Road in the Euro-Mediterranean Region and the South American Common Market, NEOTROPICAL ENTOMOLOGY, 42: 1−14. DOI: 10.1007/s13744-012-0103-3. WOS:000314275200001

58) Crouch, NR; Douwes, E; Wolfson, MM; Smith, GF; Edwards, TJ, 2008. South Africa's bioprospecting, access and benefit-sharing legislation: current realities, future complications, and a proposed alternative, SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, 104: 355−366. WOS:000262187200009

59) da Silva, M, 2019. Brazil, example of a non-Nagoya Protocol country, MICROBIOLOGY AUSTRALIA, 40: 106−108. DOI: 10.1071/MA19029. WOS:000489065800005

60) David, B, 2012. Implications of Nagoya protocol implementation for the pharmaceutical and cosmetic industries, PLANTA MEDICA, 78: 1058−1058. WOS:000307042800108

61) David, B, 2018. New regulations for accessing plant biodiversity samples, what is ABS?, PHYTOCHEMISTRY REVIEWS, 17: 1211−1223. DOI: 10.1007/s11101-018-9573-1. WOS:000448484600012

62) David, B; Wolfender, JL; Dias, DA, 2015. The pharmaceutical industry and natural products: historical status and new trends, PHYTOCHEMISTRY REVIEWS, 14: 299−315. DOI: 10.1007/s11101-014-9367-z. WOS:000352153000006

63) Davis, K; Smit, MF; Kidd, M; Sharrock, S; Allenstein, P, 2015. An access and benefit-sharing awareness survey for botanic gardens: Are they prepared for the Nagoya Protocol?, SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 98: 148−156. DOI: 10.1016/j.sajb.2015.01.015. WOS:000353612300020

64) De Jonge, B, 2011. What is Fair and Equitable Benefit-sharing?, JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL & ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS, 24: 127−146. DOI: 10.1007/s10806-010-9249-3. WOS:000287458900004

65) de Ponti, O; van den Hurk, A, 2009. Access to Biodiversity: New Rules of the Game, XXIII INTERNATIONAL EUCARPIA SYMPOSIUM, SECTION ORNAMENTALS: COLOURFUL BREEDING AND GENETICS, 836: 15−17. WOS:000305703000001

66) De Santo, EM; Jones, PJS; Miller, AMM, 2011. Fortress conservation at sea A commentary on the Chagos marine protected area, MARINE POLICY, 35: 258−260. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2010.09.004. WOS:000285440200020

67) Declerck, S; Willems, A; van der Heijden, MGA; Varese, GC; Turkovskaya, O; Evtushenko, L; Ivshina, I; Desmeth, P, 2015. PERN: art EU-Russia initiative for rhizosphere microbial resources, TRENDS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY, 33: 377−380. DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2015.03.005. WOS:000357356300003

68) Dedeurwaerdere, T; Broggiato, A; Louafi, S; Welch, EW; Batur, F, 2013. Governing Global Scientific Research Commons under the Nagoya Protocol, 2010 NAGOYA PROTOCOL ON ACCESS AND BENEFIT-SHARING IN PERSPECTIVE: IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERNATIONAL LAW AND IMPLEMENTATION CHALLENGES, 1: 389−421. WOS:000338877200014

69) Dedeurwaerdere, T; Melindi-Ghidi, P; Broggiato, A, 2016. Global scientific research commons under the Nagoya Protocol: Towards a collaborative economy model for the sharing of basic research assets, ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 55: 1−10. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.08.006. WOS:000366775200001



72) Demunshi, Y; Chugh, A, 2010. Role of traditional knowledge in marine bioprospecting, BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 19: 3015−3033. DOI: 10.1007/s10531-010-9879-9. WOS:000282870700002

73) Deplazes-Zemp, A, 2018. Commutative Justice and Access and Benefit Sharing for Genetic Resources, ETHICS POLICY & ENVIRONMENT, 21: 110−126. DOI: 10.1080/21550085.2018.1448042. WOS:000433517000020

74) Deplazes-Zemp, A, 2018. 'Genetic resources', an analysis of a multifaceted concept, BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 222: 86−94. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.03.031. WOS:000434745900009

75) Deplazes-Zemp, A, 2019. Challenges of Justice in the Context of Plant Genetic Resources, FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 10: −. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01266. WOS:000494462200001

76) Deplazes-Zemp, A; Abiven, S; Schaber, P; Schaepman, M; Schaepman-Strub, G; Schmid, B; Shimizu, KK; Altermatt, F, 2018. The Nagoya Protocol could backfire on the Global South, NATURE ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2: 917−919. DOI: 10.1038/s41559-018-0561-z. WOS:000435569300005

77) Dohm, A, 2017. Ornamental plant breeding in a changing competitive environment, ZWEITES SYMPOSIUM ZIERPFLANZENZUCHTUNG, 2017, 457: 61−63. DOI: 10.5073/jka.2017.457.014. WOS:000414274800013

78) Dorr, D, 2019. Biopiracy and the right to self-determination of indigenous peoples, PHYTOMEDICINE, 53: 308−312. DOI: 10.1016/j.phymed.2018.10.019. WOS:000459935700034

79) Drankier, P; Elferink, AGO; Visser, B; Takacs, T, 2012. Marine Genetic Resources in Areas beyond National Jurisdiction: Access and Benefit-Sharing, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MARINE AND COASTAL LAW, 27: 375−433. DOI: 10.1163/157180812X637984. WOS:000313823900007

80) Droste, N; Farley, J; Ring, I; May, PH; Ricketts, TH, 2020. Designing a global mechanism for intergovernmental biodiversity financing, CONSERVATION LETTERS, : −. DOI: 10.1111/conl.12670. WOS:000480152500001

81) Dutfield, G, 2017. TK unlimited: The emerging but incoherent international law of traditional knowledge protection, JOURNAL OF WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, 20: 144−159. DOI: 10.1111/jwip.12085. WOS:000414696000001

82) Efferth, T; Banerjee, M; Abu-Darwish, MS; Abdelfatah, S; Bockers, M; Bhakta-Guha, D; Bolzani, V; Daak, S; Demirezer, OL; Dawood, M; Efferth, M; El-Seedi, HR; Fischer, N; Greten, HJ; Hamdoun, S; Hong, CL; Horneber, M; Kadioglu, O; Khalid, HE; Khalid, SA; K, 2019. Biopiracy versus One-World Medicine-From colonial relicts to global collaborative concepts, PHYTOMEDICINE, 53: 319−331. DOI: 10.1016/j.phymed.2018.06.007. WOS:000459935700036

83) Eimer, TR; Bartels, T, 2020. From consent to consultation: Indigenous rights and the new environmental constitutionalism, ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 29: 235−256. DOI: 10.1080/09644016.2019.1595884. WOS:000515530800003

84) Ejnavarzala, H, 2010. DNA barcoding: access to biodiversity and benefit-sharing policy issues in the Indian context, CURRENT SCIENCE, 99: 594−600. WOS:000282445000021

85) Engels, JMM; Thormann, I, 2007. Horticultural genetic resources collections: Their characteristics, strengths and weaknesses, PROCEEDINGS OF THE SECOND INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON PLANT GENETIC RESOURCES OF HORTICULTURAL CROPS, VOLS 1 AND 2, : 33−. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2007.760.2. WOS:000252298000002

86) Engels, JMM; Dempewolf, H; Henson-Apollonio, V, 2011. Ethical Considerations in Agro-biodiversity Research, Collecting, and Use, JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL & ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS, 24: 107−126. DOI: 10.1007/s10806-010-9251-9. WOS:000287458900003

87) Filoche, G, 2013. Domestic biodiplomacy: navigating between provider and user categories for genetic resources in Brazil and French Guiana, INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL AGREEMENTS-POLITICS LAW AND ECONOMICS, 13: 177−196. DOI: 10.1007/s10784-012-9184-z. WOS:000317648000004

88) Fisher, W, 2018. THE PUZZLE OF TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE, DUKE LAW JOURNAL, 67: 1511−1578. WOS:000431824200004

89) Fowler, C, 2004. Regime change−Plant genetic resources in international law, OUTLOOK ON AGRICULTURE, 33: 7−14. DOI: 10.5367/000000004322877737. WOS:000220903300002

90) Fowler, C, 2004. Accessing genetic resources: international law establishes multilateral system, GENETIC RESOURCES AND CROP EVOLUTION, 51: 609−620. DOI: 10.1023/B:GRES.0000024646.81612.1f. WOS:000220927800006

91) Fraleigh, B; Davidson, CG, 2003. Overview of the international treaty on plant genetic resources for food and agriculture with emphasis on its significance for horticultural crops, PLANT GENETIC RESOURCES: THE FABRIC OF HORTICULTURE’S FUTURE, : 19−32. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2003.623.2. WOS:000186004000001

92) Fusi, F; Welch, EW; Siciliano, M, 2019. Barriers and facilitators of access to biological material for international research: The role of institutions and networks, SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY, 46: 275−289. DOI: 10.1093/scipol/scy057. WOS:000493011600011

93) Galluzzi, G; Halewood, M; Noriega, IL; Vernooy, R, 2016. Twenty-five years of international exchanges of plant genetic resources facilitated by the CGIAR genebanks: a case study on global interdependence, BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 25: 1421−1446. DOI: 10.1007/s10531-016-1109-7. WOS:000379026600002

94) Geary, J; Camicioli, E; Bubela, T, 2016. DNA barcoding in the media: does coverage of cool science reflect its social context?, GENOME, 59: 738−750. DOI: 10.1139/gen-2015-0210. WOS:000383782500010

95) George, M; George, AR, 2018. Registration of BBNJ Research Activities: A Move towards Transparency in Research Governance, JOURNAL OF EAST ASIA AND INTERNATIONAL LAW, 11: 121−143. DOI: 10.14330/jeail.2018.11.1.06. WOS:000433512600008

96) Gewin, V, 2016. Nagoya Protocol: curveball for biodiversity research?, FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 14: 176−176. WOS:000375676200003

97) Ghijsen, H, 2009. Intellectual property rights and access rules for germplasm: benefit or straitjacket?, EUPHYTICA, 170: 229−234. DOI: 10.1007/s10681-009-9941-4. WOS:000270651200019

98) Glowka, L; Normand, V, 2013. Chapter 1. The Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit-sharing: Innovations in International Environmental Law, 2010 NAGOYA PROTOCOL ON ACCESS AND BENEFIT-SHARING IN PERSPECTIVE: IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERNATIONAL LAW AND IMPLEMENTATION CHALLENGES, 1: 21−51. WOS:000338877200002

99) Golan, J; Athayde, S; Olson, EA; McAlvay, A, 2019. Intellectual Property Rights and Ethnobiology: An Update on Posey's Call to Action, JOURNAL OF ETHNOBIOLOGY, 39: 90−109. DOI: 10.2993/0278-0771-39.1.90. WOS:000463179600006

100) Gomez-Castro, B; Kipper, R, 2019. Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit-Sharing, MICROBIOLOGY AUSTRALIA, 40: 103−106. DOI: 10.1071/MA19028. WOS:000489065800004

101) Gottweis, H; Lauss, G, 2010. Biobank governance in the post-genomic age, PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 7: 187−195. DOI: 10.2217/PME.10.4. WOS:000276030800013

102) Grecksch, K; Holzhausen, J, 2017. Property rights revisited−are narratives the way forward?, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LAW IN THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 9: 94−107. DOI: 10.1108/IJLBE-09-2016-0014. WOS:000407445200001

103) Greiber, T, 2019. Implementation of the Nagoya Protocol in the European Union and in Germany, PHYTOMEDICINE, 53: 313−318. DOI: 10.1016/j.phymed.2018.10.020. WOS:000459935700035

104) Groen, L, 2019. Explaining European Union effectiveness (goal achievement) in the Convention on Biological Diversity: the importance of diplomatic engagement, INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL AGREEMENTS-POLITICS LAW AND ECONOMICS, 19: 69−87. DOI: 10.1007/s10784-018-9424-y. WOS:000458192900004

105) Gronvall, GK, 2015. US COMPETITIVENESS IN SYNTHETIC BIOLOGY, HEALTH SECURITY, 13: 378−389. DOI: 10.1089/hs.2015.0046. WOS:000369691800004

106) Halewood, M; Chiurugwi, T; Hamilton, RS; Kurtz, B; Marden, E; Welch, E; Michiels, F; Mozafari, J; Sabran, M; Patron, N; Kersey, P; Bastow, R; Dorius, S; Dias, S; McCouch, S; Powell, W, 2018. Plant genetic resources for food and agriculture: opportunities and challenges emerging from the science and information technology revolution, NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 217: 1407−1419. DOI: 10.1111/nph.14993. WOS:000424284400005

107) Harden-Davies, H, 2017. Deep-sea genetic resources: New frontiers for science and stewardship in areas beyond national jurisdiction, DEEP-SEA RESEARCH PART II-TOPICAL STUDIES IN OCEANOGRAPHY, 137: 504−513. DOI: 10.1016/j.dsr2.2016.05.005. WOS:000398749900040

108) Hashiguchi, A; Tian, JK; Komatsu, S, 2017. Proteomic Contributions to Medicinal Plant Research: From Plant Metabolism to Pharmacological Action, PROTEOMES, 5: −. DOI: 10.3390/proteomes5040035. WOS:000419237600012

109) Havinga, R; Kool, A; Achille, F; Bavcon, J; Berg, C; Bonomi, C; Burkart, M; De Meyere, D; Hart, J; Havstrom, M; Kessler, P; Knickmann, B; Koster, N; Martinez, R; Ostgaard, H; Ravnjak, B; Scheen, AC; Smith, P; Smith, P; Socher, SA; Vange, V, 2016. The Index Seminum: Seeds of change for seed exchange, TAXON, 65: 333−336. DOI: 10.12705/652.9. WOS:000375823500009

110) Heeren, A; Cheikyoussef, A; Chimwamurombe, P, 2016. Commercializing traditional knowledge: Regulating access and benefit-sharing in Namibia, PLANTA MEDICA, 82: −. DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1596620. WOS:000411789300444

111) Heiniger, U, 2016. Tef (Eragrostis tef (ZUCC.) TROTTER)−gluten-free Grain from Ethiopia, SCHWEIZERISCHE ZEITSCHRIFT FUER GANZHEITSMEDIZIN, 28: 281−292. DOI: 10.1159/000446455. WOS:000392809900008

112) Heinrich, M; Hesketh, A, 2019. 25 years after the 'Rio Convention'-Lessons learned in the context of sustainable development and protecting indigenous and local knowledge, PHYTOMEDICINE, 53: 332−343. DOI: 10.1016/j.phymed.2018.04.061. WOS:000459935700037

113) Hinsley, A; Roberts, DL, 2018. Assessing the extent of access and benefit sharing in the wildlife trade: lessons from horticultural orchids in Southeast Asia, ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, 45: 261−268. DOI: 10.1017/S0376892917000467. WOS:000440936800006

114) Houssin, D, 2017. Global health security at the time of Nagoya, BULLETIN DE L ACADEMIE NATIONALE DE MEDECINE, 201: 623−629. DOI: 10.1016/S0001-4079(19)30438-8. WOS:000434372600010

115) Huang, LS; Flavell, R; Donnison, IS; Chiang, YC; Hastings, A; Hayes, C; Heidt, C; Hong, H; Hsu, TW; Humphreys, M; Jackson, J; Norris, J; Schwarz, KU; Squance, M; Swaller, T; Thomas, ID; van Assche, W; Xi, QG; Yamada, T; Youell, S; Clifton-Brown, J, 2019. Collecting wild Miscanthus germplasm in Asia for crop improvement and conservation in Europe whilst adhering to the guidelines of the United Nations' Convention on Biological Diversity, ANNALS OF BOTANY, 124: 591−604. DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcy231. WOS:000503881100008

116) Humphries, F; Benzie, JAH; Morrison, C, 2019. A systematic quantitative literature review of aquaculture genetic resource access and benefit sharing, REVIEWS IN AQUACULTURE, 11: 1133−1147. DOI: 10.1111/raq.12283. WOS:000495397700009


118) Humphries, F, 2017. A patent defence approach to sharing aquaculture genetic resources across jurisdictional areas, JOURNAL OF WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, 20: 221−238. DOI: 10.1111/jwip.12082. WOS:000414696000005

119) Humphries, F, 2018. Sharing aquatic genetic resources across jurisdictions: playing 'chicken' in the sea, INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL AGREEMENTS-POLITICS LAW AND ECONOMICS, 18: 541−556. DOI: 10.1007/s10784-018-9403-3. WOS:000441114200005

120) Humphries, F; Robinson, DF; Loban, H, 2017. Implications of Indigenous Land Tenure Changes for Accessing Indigenous Genetic Resources from Northern Australia, ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING LAW JOURNAL, 34: 560−579. WOS:000416405400007

121) Jacob, SR; Tyagi, V; Agrawal, A; Chakrabarty, SK; Tyagi, RK, 2015. Indian Plant Germplasm on the Global Platter: An Analysis, PLOS ONE, 10: −. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126634. WOS:000354545600069

122) Johansen, E, 2017. Future access and improvement of industrial lactic acid bacteria cultures, MICROBIAL CELL FACTORIES, 16: −. DOI: 10.1186/s12934-017-0851-1. WOS:000418667900002

123) Jorem, A; Tvedt, MW, 2014. Bioprospecting in the High Seas: Existing Rights and Obligations in View of a New Legal Regime for Marine Areas beyond National Jurisdiction, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MARINE AND COASTAL LAW, 29: 321−343. DOI: 10.1163/15718085-12341319. WOS:000338171400004

124) Kamardeen, N, 2015. Community Rights to Intellectual Property in Asia-From Rhetoric to Consensus, JOURNAL OF WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, 18: 311−334. DOI: 10.1111/jwip.12042. WOS:000366971600003

125) Kariyawasam, K; Tsai, M, 2018. Access to genetic resources and benefit sharing: Implications of Nagoya Protocol on providers and users, JOURNAL OF WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, 21: 289−305. DOI: 10.1111/jwip.12095. WOS:000450261800002

126) Kim, S; Seo, AY; Lee, TG, 2020. Functionalized cellulose to remove surfactants from cosmetic products in wastewater, CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS, 236: −. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116010. WOS:000519306900038

127) Knauf, S; Abel, L; Hallmaier-Wacker, LK, 2019. The Nagoya protocol and research on emerging infectious diseases, BULLETIN OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, 97: 379−379. DOI: 10.2471/BLT.19.232173. WOS:000471826300002

128) Kochhar, S, 2008. Institutions and Capacity Building for the Evolution of Intellectual Property Rights Regime in India: V−Analysis of Review of TRIPS Agreement and R&D Prospect in Indian Agriculture under IPR Regime, JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS, 13: 536−547. WOS:000260885900018

129) Kohler-Rollefson, I, 2016. Innovations and diverse livelihood pathways: alternative livelihoods, livelihood diversification and societal transformation in pastoral communities, REVUE SCIENTIFIQUE ET TECHNIQUE-OFFICE INTERNATIONAL DES EPIZOOTIES, 35: 611−618. DOI: 10.20506/rst.35.2.2529. WOS:000390831100022

130) Koopman, J, 2005. Reconciliation of proprietary interests in genetic and knowledge resources: Hurry cautiously!, ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 53: 523−541. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.09.025. WOS:000230162400007


132) Koskela, J; Vinceti, B; Dvorak, W; Bush, D; Dawson, IK; Loo, J; Kjaer, ED; Navarro, C; Padolina, C; Bordacs, S; Jamnadass, R; Graudal, L; Ramamonjisoa, L, 2014. Utilization and transfer of forest genetic resources: A global review, FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 333: 22−34. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.07.017. WOS:000347663900003

133) Krigas, N; Menteli, V; Vokou, D, 2014. The Electronic Trade in Greek Endemic Plants: Biodiversity, Commercial and Legal Aspects, ECONOMIC BOTANY, 68: 85−95. DOI: 10.1007/s12231-014-9264-9. WOS:000333128300007

134) Krigas, N; Menteli, V; Chrysanthou, P; Vokou, D, 2017. The electronic trade in endemic plants of Cyprus through the Internet, PLANT BIOSYSTEMS, 151: 387−393. DOI: 10.1080/11263504.2016.1193069. WOS:000399481200003

135) Kruitwagen, A; Beukeboom, LW; Wertheim, B, 2018. Optimization of native biocontrol agents, with parasitoids of the invasive pest Drosophila suzukii as an example, EVOLUTIONARY APPLICATIONS, 11: 1473−1497. DOI: 10.1111/eva.12648. WOS:000447131200001

136) Kursar, TA, 2011. What Are the Implications of the Nagoya Protocol for Research on Biodiversity?, BIOSCIENCE, 61: 256−257. DOI: 10.1525/bio.2011.61.4.2. WOS:000289319900007

137) Lai, JC; Robinson, DF; Stirrup, T; Tualima, HY, 2019. Maori knowledge under the microscope: Appropriation and patenting of matauranga Maori and related resources, JOURNAL OF WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, 22: 205−233. DOI: 10.1111/jwip.12125. WOS:000475965800007

138) Laird, SA; Wynberg, RP, 2016. Locating Responsible Research and Innovation Within Access and Benefit Sharing Spaces of the Convention on Biological Diversity: the Challenge of Emerging Technologies, NANOETHICS, 10: 189−200. DOI: 10.1007/s11569-016-0268-z. WOS:000380149900008

139) Laird, S; Wynberg, R; Rourke, M; Humphries, F; Muller, MR; Lawson, C, 2020. Rethink the expansion of access and benefit sharing, SCIENCE, 367: 1200−1202. DOI: 10.1126/science.aba9609. WOS:000520023800024

140) Lajaunie, C; Ho, CWL, 2018. Pathogens collections, biobanks and related-data in a One Health legal and ethical perspective, PARASITOLOGY, 145: 688−696. DOI: 10.1017/S0031182017001986. WOS:000439561300015

141) Lallier, LE; McMeel, O; Greiber, T; Vanagt, T; Dobson, ADW; Jaspars, M, 2014. Access to and use of marine genetic resources: understanding the legal framework, NATURAL PRODUCT REPORTS, 31: 612−616. DOI: 10.1039/c3np70123a. WOS:000334603300001

142) Langford, J, 2004. Discussion paper−Access and benefit-sharing: the role of scientists, International Expert Workshop on Access to Genetic Resources and Benefit Sharing, Record of Discussion, : 256−257. WOS:000243638100040

143) Lawson, C; Rourke, M, 2016. Open Access DNA, RNA and Amino Acid Sequences: The Consequences and Solutions for the International Regulation of Access and Benefit Sharing, JOURNAL OF LAW AND MEDICINE, 24: 96−118. WOS:000385613600009

144) Lawson, C, 2011. Patents and Access and Benefit-Sharing Contracts: Conservation or Just More Red Tape?, BIOTECHNOLOGY LAW REPORT, 30: 197−206. DOI: 10.1089/blr.2011.9961. WOS:000289556000004

145) Lawson, C, 2015. The breeder's exemption under UPOV 1991, the Convention on Biological Diversity and its Nagoya Protocol, JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW & PRACTICE, 10: 526−535. DOI: 10.1093/jiplp/jpv080. WOS:000213675700005

146) Lawson, C; Humphries, F; Rourke, M, 2019. The future of information under the CBD, Nagoya Protocol, Plant Treaty, and PIP Framework, JOURNAL OF WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, 22: 103−119. DOI: 10.1111/jwip.12118. WOS:000475965800002

147) Lawson, C; Wraith, J; Pickering, C, 2019. Regulating Wild Collected Orchids? The CBD, Nagoya Protocol and CITES Overlaps, ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING LAW JOURNAL, 36: 339−361. WOS:000483889900004

148) Leary, D, 2008. Greenland's new legislation on commercial and research-related use of biological resources: implications for the International Polar Year and later, POLAR RECORD, 44: 97−106. DOI: 10.1017/S0032247407007073. WOS:000253188200001

149) Leary, D, 2019. Agreeing to disagree on what we have or have not agreed on: The current state of play of the BBNJ negotiations on the status of marine genetic resources in areas beyond national jurisdiction, MARINE POLICY, 99: 21−29. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2018.10.031. WOS:000454467200003

150) Lee, BK; Sohn, SY, 2016. Patent portfolio-based indicators to evaluate the commercial benefits of national plant genetic resources, ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 70: 43−52. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.05.002. WOS:000388785200006

151) Lee, S; Jung, PE; Lee, Y, 2016. Publicly-funded biobanks and networks in East Asia, SPRINGERPLUS, 5: −. DOI: 10.1186/s40064-016-2723-2. WOS:000381633700002

152) Lee, S; Nam, S; Jung, PE; Kim, KJ; Lee, Y, 2016. Asian Network of Research Resource Centers, BIOPRESERVATION AND BIOBANKING, 14: 424−428. DOI: 10.1089/bio.2016.0008. WOS:000386473600010

153) Lewin, HA; Robinson, GE; Kress, WJ; Baker, WJ; Coddington, J; Crandall, KA; Durbin, R; Edwards, SV; Forest, F; Gilbert, MTP; Goldstein, MM; Grigoriev, IV; Hackett, KJ; Haussler, D; Jarvis, ED; Johnson, WE; Patrinos, A; Richards, S; Castilla-Rubio, JC; van, 2018. Earth BioGenome Project: Sequencing life for the future of life, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 115: 4325−4333. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1720115115. WOS:000430697500045

154) Li, JS; van Bueren, ETL; Huang, KJ; Qin, LQ; Song, YC, 2013. The potential of participatory hybrid breeding, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SUSTAINABILITY, 11: 234−251. DOI: 10.1080/14735903.2012.728050. WOS:000321484800003

155) Lingard, K; Perry, M, 2018. An assessment of the regulatory framework of the Western Australian sandalwood industry, AUSTRALIAN FORESTRY, 81: 89−101. DOI: 10.1080/00049158.2017.1420455. WOS:000433542000003


157) Lorenzen, B, 2009. Access and Benefit-Sharing under the CBD−What Consequences Might an International Regime Have for the Horticultural Sector?, XXIII INTERNATIONAL EUCARPIA SYMPOSIUM, SECTION ORNAMENTALS: COLOURFUL BREEDING AND GENETICS, 836: 19−24. WOS:000305703000002

158) Louwaars, NP, 2018. Plant breeding and diversity: A troubled relationship?, EUPHYTICA, 214: −. DOI: 10.1007/s10681-018-2192-5. WOS:000435724100002

159) Louwaars, N, 2019. Open Source Seed, a Revolution in Breeding or Yet Another Attack on the Breeder's Exemption?, FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 10: −. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01127. WOS:000486485500001

160) Luzuriaga-Quichimbo, CX; Blanco-Salas, J; Munoz-Centeno, LM; Pelaez, R; Ceron-Martinez, CE; Ruiz-Tellez, T, 2019. In Silico Molecular Studies of Antiophidic Properties of the Amazonian Tree Cordia nodosa Lam., MOLECULES, 24: −. DOI: 10.3390/molecules24224160. WOS:000501529700149

161) Manheim, BS, 2016. Regulation of synthetic biology under the Nagoya Protocol, NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 34: 1104−1105. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.3716. WOS:000387506500018

162) Marden, E, 2017. US ratification of Plant Treaty: benefit sharing ambiguity for plant genomics researchers does not change, GENETIC RESOURCES AND CROP EVOLUTION, 64: 1133−1139. DOI: 10.1007/s10722-017-0528-y. WOS:000404901300005

163) Mardiastuti, A, 2019. Implementation of Access and Benefit Sharing in Indonesia: Review and Case Studies, MANAJEMEN HUTAN TROPIKA, 25: 35−43. DOI: 10.7226/jtfm.25.1.35. WOS:000467637400004

164) Martin, A; McGuire, S; Sullivan, S, 2013. Global environmental justice and biodiversity conservation, GEOGRAPHICAL JOURNAL, 179: 122−131. DOI: 10.1111/geoj.12018. WOS:000318567700004

165) Martin, F; Cahill, A; Wright, E; Stoianoff, N, 2019. An international approach to establishing a Competent Authority to manage and protect traditional knowledge, ALTERNATIVE LAW JOURNAL, 44: 48−55. DOI: 10.1177/1037969X18815254. WOS:000463030800009

166) Martinez, SI; Biber-Klemm, S, 2010. Scientists−take action for access to biodiversity, CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2: 27−33. DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.03.004. WOS:000282613400005

167) Martins, J; Cruz, D; Vasconcelos, V, 2020. The Nagoya Protocol and Its Implications on the EU Atlantic Area Countries, JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 8: 92−. DOI: 10.3390/jmse8020092. WOS:000519244200081

168) Martins, J; Cruz, D; Vasconcelos, V, 2020. The Nagoya Protocol and Its Implications on the EU Atlantic Arc Countries Legislation, MARINE DRUGS, 18: −. WOS:000513184600236

169) Martyniuk, E, 2011. Do we need a binding treaty for access and benefit-sharing in animal genetic resources?, JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BREEDING AND GENETICS, 128: 85−86. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2011.00919.x. WOS:000288165600001

170) Martyniuk, E; Berger, B; Bojkovski, D; Bouchel, D; Hiemstra, SJ; Marguerat, C; Matlova, V; Saether, N, 2017. Possible consequences of the Nagoya Protocol for animal breeding and the worldwide exchange of animal genetic resources, ACTA AGRICULTURAE SCANDINAVICA SECTION A-ANIMAL SCIENCE, 67: 96−106. DOI: 10.1080/09064702.2018.1435714. WOS:000441768800002

171) Mason, PG; Cock, MJW; Barratt, BIP; Klapwijk, JN; van Lenteren, JC; Brodeur, J; Hoelmer, KA; Heimpel, GE, 2018. Best practices for the use and exchange of invertebrate biological control genetic resources relevant for food and agriculture, BIOCONTROL, 63: 149−154. DOI: 10.1007/s10526-017-9810-3. WOS:000422647200011

172) Matseketsa, G; Chibememe, G; Muboko, N; Gandiwa, E; Takarinda, K, 2018. Towards an Understanding of Conservation-Based Costs, Benefits, and Attitudes of Local People Living Adjacent to Save Valley Conservancy, Zimbabwe, SCIENTIFICA, : −. DOI: 10.1155/2018/6741439. WOS:000444954100001

173) McCluskey, K; Barker, KB; Barton, HA; Boundy-Mills, K; Brown, DR; Coddington, JA; Cook, K; Desmeth, P; Geiser, D; Glaeser, JA; Greene, S; Kang, S; Lomas, MW; Melcher, U; Miller, SE; Nobles, DR; Owens, KJ; Reichman, JH; Silva, MD; Wertz, J; Whitworth, C; S, 2017. The US Culture Collection Network Responding to the Requirements of the Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit Sharing, MBIO, 8: −. DOI: 10.1128/mBio.00982-17. WOS:000409384300059

174) McCune, LM, 2018. The Protection of Indigenous Peoples' Seed Rights during Ethnobotanical Research, ETHNOBIOLOGY LETTERS, 9: 67−75. DOI: 10.14237/ebl.9.1.2018.1076. WOS:000439054300008

175) McNeely, JA, 2011. What more can plant scientists do to help save the green stuff?, BOTANICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY, 166: 233−239. DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2011.01151.x. WOS:000292102000004

176) Medaglia, JC; Perron-Welch, F, 2019. The benefit-sharing principle in international law, JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW & PRACTICE, 14: 62−76. DOI: 10.1093/jiplp/jpy162. WOS:000456011600009

177) Medaglia, JC, 2013. The Implementation of the Nagoya Protocol in Latin America and the Caribbean: Challenges and Opportunities, 2010 NAGOYA PROTOCOL ON ACCESS AND BENEFIT-SHARING IN PERSPECTIVE: IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERNATIONAL LAW AND IMPLEMENTATION CHALLENGES, 1: 331−368. WOS:000338877200012

178) Mendenhall, E; De Santo, E; Nyman, E; Tiller, R, 2019. A soft treaty, hard to reach: The second inter-governmental conference for biodiversity beyond national jurisdiction, MARINE POLICY, 108: −. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2019.103664. WOS:000495518700032

179) Messing, R; Brodeur, J, 2018. Current challenges to the implementation of classical biological control, BIOCONTROL, 63: 1−9. DOI: 10.1007/s10526-017-9862-4. WOS:000422647200001

180) Moore, G; Engels, J; Fowler, C, 2007. The International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture: Access, benefit sharing and conservation, PROCEEDINGS OF THE SECOND INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON PLANT GENETIC RESOURCES OF HORTICULTURAL CROPS, VOLS 1 AND 2, : 27−. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2007.760.1. WOS:000252298000001

181) Morgera, E, 2012. Bilateralism at the Service of Community Interests? Non-Judicial Enforcement of Global Public Goods in the Context of Global Environmental Law, EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, 23: 743−767. DOI: 10.1093/ejil/chs037. WOS:000310153600009

182) Morioka, H, 2018. Research Compliance with the Nagoya Protocol, JAPANESE JOURNAL OF APPLIED ENTOMOLOGY AND ZOOLOGY, 62: 21−28. DOI: 10.1303/jjaez.2018.21. WOS:000428005200003

183) Morris, C, 2019. A 'Homeland's' Harvest: Biotraffic and Biotrade in the Contemporary Ciskei Region of South Africa, JOURNAL OF SOUTHERN AFRICAN STUDIES, 45: 597−616. DOI: 10.1080/03057070.2019.1632667. WOS:000479794300001

184) Mulesa, TH; Westengen, OT, 2020. Against the grain? A historical institutional analysis of access governance of plant genetic resources for food and agriculture in Ethiopia, JOURNAL OF WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, 23: 82−120. DOI: 10.1111/jwip.12142. WOS:000509423000001

185) Munyi, P; Jonas, H, 2013. Chapter 7. Implementing the Nagoya Protocol in Africa: Opportunities and Challenges for African Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities, 2010 NAGOYA PROTOCOL ON ACCESS AND BENEFIT-SHARING IN PERSPECTIVE: IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERNATIONAL LAW AND IMPLEMENTATION CHALLENGES, 1: 217−245. WOS:000338877200008

186) Myburgh, AF, 2011. Legal developments in the protection of plant-related traditional knowledge: An intellectual property lawyer's perspective of the international and South African legal framework, SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 77: 844−849. DOI: 10.1016/j.sajb.2011.09.003. WOS:000298123500004


188) Neumann, D; Lohne, C; Casino, A; Bodegard, J; Lyal, CHC; Nivart, A; Williams, C; Giere, P, 2015. The sustainable use of global biodiversity: scope and relevance of the Nagoya Protocol and the Convention of Biological Diversity for Natural History Collections and researchers, GENOME, 58: 261−261. WOS:000360861200287

189) Neumann, D; Borisenko, AV; Coddington, JA; Hauser, CL; Butler, CR; Casino, A; Vogel, JC; Haszprunar, G; Giere, P, 2018. Global biodiversity research tied up by juridical interpretations of access and benefit sharing, ORGANISMS DIVERSITY & EVOLUTION, 18: 1−12. DOI: 10.1007/s13127-017-0347-1. WOS:000427516200001

190) Nijar, GS, 2011. Food security and access and benefit sharing laws relating to genetic resources: promoting synergies in national and international governance, INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL AGREEMENTS-POLITICS LAW AND ECONOMICS, 11: 99−116. DOI: 10.1007/s10784-010-9131-9. WOS:000293789200001

191) Nijar, GS, 2013. Chapter 8. An Asian Developing Country's View on the Implementation Challenges of the Nagoya Protocol, 2010 NAGOYA PROTOCOL ON ACCESS AND BENEFIT-SHARING IN PERSPECTIVE: IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERNATIONAL LAW AND IMPLEMENTATION CHALLENGES, 1: 247−268. WOS:000338877200009

192) Nijar, GS; Louafi, S; Welch, EW, 2017. The implementation of the Nagoya ABS Protocol for the research sector: experience and challenges, INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL AGREEMENTS-POLITICS LAW AND ECONOMICS, 17: 607−621. DOI: 10.1007/s10784-016-9328-7. WOS:000410711800001

193) Ninawe, AS; Indulkar, ST, 2017. Intellectual Property Rights and Innovation in Marine Biotechnology, ASIAN BIOTECHNOLOGY AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW, 19: 31−49. WOS:000416761500003

194) Njamnshi, AB, 2004. Discussion paper−Towards an international regime that stresses infrastructural capacity development in the source countries as a key factor for effective access and benefit sharing in bioprospecting, International Expert Workshop on Access to Genetic Resources and Benefit Sharing, Record of Discussion, : 130−133. WOS:000243638100016

195) Noriega, IL; Halewood, M; Abberton, M; Amri, A; Angarawai, II; Anglin, N; Blummel, M; Bouman, B; Campos, H; Costich, D; Ellis, D; Gaur, PM; Guarino, L; Hanson, J; Kommerell, V; Kumar, L; Lusty, C; Ndjiondjop, MN; Payne, T; Peters, M; Popova, E; Prakash, G, 2019. CGIAR Operations under the Plant Treaty Framework, CROP SCIENCE, 59: 819−832. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2018.08.0526. WOS:000468206500001

196) Oberthur, S; Groen, L, 2015. The Effectiveness Dimension of the EU's Performance in International Institutions: Toward a More Comprehensive Assessment Framework, JCMS-JOURNAL OF COMMON MARKET STUDIES, 53: 1319−1335. DOI: 10.1111/jcms.12279. WOS:000363522000008

197) Oberthur, S; Pozarowska, J, 2013. Managing Institutional Complexity and Fragmentation: The Nagoya Protocol and the Global Governance of Genetic Resources, GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 13: 100−. DOI: 10.1162/GLEP_a_00185. WOS:000322780100006

198) Oberthur, S; Rabitz, F, 2014. On the EU's performance and leadership in global environmental governance: the case of the Nagoya Protocol, JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN PUBLIC POLICY, 21: 39−57. DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2013.834547. WOS:000328243100003

199) Oldham, P; Hall, S; Forero, O, 2013. Biological Diversity in the Patent System, PLOS ONE, 8: −. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078737. WOS:000327252100047

200) Oliva, M, 2010. Access and benefit sharing and the ethical sourcing of biodiversity, PLANTA MEDICA, 76: 1177−1177. WOS:000282066500058

201) Oliva, MJ, 2011. Sharing the Benefits of Biodiversity: A New International Protocol and its Implications for Research and Development, PLANTA MEDICA, 77: 1221−1227. DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1279978. WOS:000293007700017

202) Oliva, MJ, 2013. The Implications of the Nagoya Protocol for the Ethical Sourcing of Biodiversity, 2010 NAGOYA PROTOCOL ON ACCESS AND BENEFIT-SHARING IN PERSPECTIVE: IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERNATIONAL LAW AND IMPLEMENTATION CHALLENGES, 1: 371−387. WOS:000338877200013

203) Oliva, MJ, 2015. Ethical BioTrade, Biodiversity and Sustainable Development, ASIAN BIOTECHNOLOGY AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW, 17: 39−55. WOS:000377889700004

204) Olsen, RT, 2013. Asian Germplasm in American Horticulture: New Thoughts on an Old Theme, HORTSCIENCE, 48: 1073−1077. DOI: 10.21273/HORTSCI.48.9.1073. WOS:000326305700002

205) Orsini, A, 2016. Do Non-State Perspectives Matter for Treaty Ratification and Implementation? The case of the European Consultation on the Nagoya protocol, ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY AND GOVERNANCE, 26: 377−393. DOI: 10.1002/eet.1712. WOS:000388299000005

206) Overmann, J; Scholz, AH, 2017. Microbiological Research Under the Nagoya Protocol: Facts and Fiction, TRENDS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 25: 85−88. DOI: 10.1016/j.tim.2016.11.001. WOS:000393723100001

207) Overmann, J, 2015. Significance and future role of microbial resource centers, SYSTEMATIC AND APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 38: 258−265. DOI: 10.1016/j.syapm.2015.02.008. WOS:000356644900008

208) Park, JM; Hong, JW; Son, JS; Hwang, YJ; Cho, HM; You, YH; Ghim, SY, 2018. A strategy for securing unique microbial resources−focusing on Dokdo islands-derived microbial resources, ISRAEL JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 64: 1−15. DOI: 10.1163/22244662-20181024. WOS:000457990500001

209) Parks, L, 2018. Challenging power from the bottom up? Community protocols, benefit-sharing, and the challenge of dominant discourses, GEOFORUM, 88: 87−95. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.11.011. WOS:000427212800012

210) Pateiro, LM, 2020. Advances and uncertainties in compliance measures for users from the Nagoya Protocol in the European Union, REVIEW OF EUROPEAN COMPARATIVE & INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW, : −. DOI: 10.1111/reel.12320. WOS:000510601700001

211) Pauchard, N, 2017. Access and Benefit Sharing under the Convention on Biological Diversity and Its Protocol: What Can Some Numbers Tell Us about the Effectiveness of the Regulatory Regime?, RESOURCES-BASEL, 6: −. DOI: 10.3390/resources6010011. WOS:000398704000010

212) Pavone, IR, 2018. The Nagoya Protocol and the updation of the principle of Access and Benefit Sharing with particular reference to user compliance pillar, BIOLAW JOURNAL-RIVISTA DI BIODIRITTO, : 251−273. WOS:000427558700031


214) Pedrollo, CT; Kinupp, VF, 2015. Sustainability or Colonialism? Legislative obstacles to research and development of natural products and patents on traditional knowledge in Brazil, ACTA BOTANICA BRASILICA, 29: 452−456. DOI: 10.1590/0102-33062015abb0101. WOS:000361864400019

215) Pellegrini, PA; Balatti, GE, 2016. Noah's arks in the XXI century. A typology of seed banks, BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 25: 2753−2769. DOI: 10.1007/s10531-016-1201-z. WOS:000387475900011

216) Perdue, DO, 2016. Whither Innovation: The R&D Sector and the Nagoya Protocol at One Year After Entry into Force, BIOTECHNOLOGY LAW REPORT, 35: 9−17. DOI: 10.1089/blr.2016.28999.dop. WOS:000369992100008

217) Perdue, DO, 2017. Patent Disclosure Requirements Related to Genetic Resources: The Right Tool for the Job?, BIOTECHNOLOGY LAW REPORT, 36: 285−296. DOI: 10.1089/blr.2017.29042.dop. WOS:000418055400009

218) Polski, M, 2005. The institutional economics of biodiversity, biological materials, and bioprospecting, ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 53: 543−557. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.09.024. WOS:000230162400008

219) Prajeesh, P, 2017. India lays the cornerstone of biodiversity access and benefit sharing system, CURRENT SCIENCE, 112: 24−28. WOS:000392355900007

220) Prathapan, KD; Rajan, PD, 2011. Biodiversity access and benefit-sharing: weaving a rope of sand, CURRENT SCIENCE, 100: 290−293. WOS:000287537300009

221) Puig-Marco, R, 2014. Access and benefit sharing of Antarctica's Biological Material, MARINE GENOMICS, 17: 73−78. DOI: 10.1016/j.margen.2014.04.008. WOS:000345476000012

222) Pythoud, F, 2004. Vision and nature of an international regime on access and benefit-sharing (ABS), International Expert Workshop on Access to Genetic Resources and Benefit Sharing, Record of Discussion, : 101−104. WOS:000243638100009

223) Rabitz, F, 2017. Access without benefit-sharing: design, effectiveness and reform of the FAO seed treaty, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE COMMONS, 11: 621−640. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.736. WOS:000413186700002

224) Rabitz, F, 2018. Regime complexes, critical actors and institutional layering, JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS AND DEVELOPMENT, 21: 300−321. DOI: 10.1057/jird.2016.16. WOS:000436615700003

225) Rabone, M; Harden-Davies, H; Collins, JE; Zajderman, S; Appeltans, W; Droege, G; Brandt, A; Pardo-Lopez, L; Dahlgren, TG; Glover, AG; Horton, T, 2019. Access to Marine Genetic Resources (MGR): Raising Awareness of Best-Practice Through a New Agreement for Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction (BBNJ), FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE, 6: −. DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2019.00520. WOS:000485256000002

226) Rana, RS, 2014. Global governance and national mechanisms in India for regulating access to genetic resources and benefit sharing, INDIAN JOURNAL OF GENETICS AND PLANT BREEDING, 74: 656−664. DOI: 10.5958/0975-6906.2014.00906.7. WOS:000350899400021

227) Ravi, SB, 2006. Infirmities and inconsistencies of Indian legislations on access and benefit sharing, CURRENT SCIENCE, 90: 15−19. WOS:000234742100007

228) Reihling, HCW, 2008. Bioprospecting the African Renaissance: The new value of muthi in South Africa, JOURNAL OF ETHNOBIOLOGY AND ETHNOMEDICINE, 4: −. DOI: 10.1186/1746-4269-4-9. WOS:000209491000009

229) Renner, SC; Neumann, D; Burkart, M; Feit, U; Giere, P; Groger, A; Paulsch, A; Paulsch, C; Sterz, M; Vohland, K, 2012. Import and export of biological samples from tropical countries-considerations and guidelines for research teams, ORGANISMS DIVERSITY & EVOLUTION, 12: 81−98. DOI: 10.1007/s13127-012-0076-4. WOS:000305527700007

230) Richerzhagen, C; Holm-Mueller, K, 2005. The effectiveness of access and benefit sharing in Costa Rica: Implications for national and international regimes, ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 53: 445−460. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.06.031. WOS:000230162400002

231) Richerzhagen, C, 2011. Effective governance of access and benefit-sharing under the Convention on Biological Diversity, BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 20: 2243−2261. DOI: 10.1007/s10531-011-0086-0. WOS:000293286300010

232) Ridings, P, 2018. Redefining environmental stewardship to deliver governance frameworks for marine biodiversity beyond national jurisdiction, ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE, 75: 435−443. DOI: 10.1093/icesjms/fsx122. WOS:000424080500040

233) Robinson, DF; Forsyth, M, 2016. People, plants, place, and rules: the Nagoya Protocol in pacific island countries, GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 54: 324−335. DOI: 10.1111/1745-5871.12178. WOS:000386911500009

234) Robinson, D; Raven, M, 2017. Identifying and Preventing Biopiracy in Australia: patent landscapes and legal geographies for plants with Indigenous Australian uses, AUSTRALIAN GEOGRAPHER, 48: 311−331. DOI: 10.1080/00049182.2016.1229240. WOS:000401453900002

235) Robinson, DF; Raven, M, 2020. Recognising Indigenous customary law of totemic plant species: Challenges and pathways, GEOGRAPHICAL JOURNAL, 186: −. DOI: 10.1111/geoj.12320. WOS:000481016800001

236) Robinson, DF, 2013. Legal Geographies of Intellectual Property, 'Traditional' Knowledge and Biodiversity: Experiencing Conventions, Laws, Customary Law, and Karma in Thailand, GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 51: 375−386. DOI: 10.1111/1745-5871.12022. WOS:000326734600004

237) Rolfova, E, 2019. National Legal Framework on Nagoya Protocol, SEED AND SEEDLINGS XIV, : 10−12. WOS:000519118700001

238) Rosendal, K; Andresen, S, 2016. Realizing access and benefit sharing from use of genetic resources between diverging international regimes: the scope for leadership, INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL AGREEMENTS-POLITICS LAW AND ECONOMICS, 16: 579−596. DOI: 10.1007/s10784-014-9271-4. WOS:000379544200007

239) Rosendal, GK; Myhr, AI; Tvedt, MW, 2016. Access and Benefit Sharing Legislation for Marine Bioprospecting: Lessons From Australia for the Role of Marbank in Norway, JOURNAL OF WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, 19: 86−98. DOI: 10.1111/jwip.12058. WOS:000380252500001

240) Rourke, MF, 2018. Who Are "Indigenous and Local Communities" and What Is "Traditional Knowledge" for Virus Access and Benefit-sharing? A Textual Analysis of the Convention on Biological Diversity and Its Nagoya Protocol, JOURNAL OF LAW AND MEDICINE, 25: 707−726. WOS:000429238400008

241) Rourke, MF, 2018. Never Mind the Science, Here's the Convention on Biological Diversity: Viral Sovereignty in the Smallpox Destruction Debate, JOURNAL OF LAW AND MEDICINE, 25: 429−447. WOS:000425991800010

242) Rourke, MF, 2018. When knowledge goes viral: Assessing the possibility of virus-related traditional knowledge for access and benefit-sharing, JOURNAL OF WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, 21: 356−368. DOI: 10.1111/jwip.12100. WOS:000450261800005

243) Rourke, MF, 2019. Access by Design, Benefits if Convenient: A Closer Look at the Pandemic Influenza Preparedness Framework's Standard Material Transfer Agreements, MILBANK QUARTERLY, 97: 91−112. DOI: 10.1111/1468-0009.12364. WOS:000461860200012

244) Ryan, MJ; McCluskey, K; Verkleij, G; Robert, V; Smith, D, 2019. Fungal biological resources to support international development: challenges and opportunities, WORLD JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY & BIOTECHNOLOGY, 35: −. DOI: 10.1007/s11274-019-2709-7. WOS:000482913800002



247) Sava, CS; Antofie, MM, 2019. Bioprospecting Wild Biodiversity in Romania: Case Study−Gentiana lutea, ROMANIAN BIOTECHNOLOGICAL LETTERS, 24: 129−139. DOI: 10.25083/rbl/24.1/129.139. WOS:000463708100015

248) Savaresi, A, 2013. REDD plus and Human Rights: Addressing Synergies between International Regimes, ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 18: −. DOI: 10.5751/ES-05549-180305. WOS:000325521300011

249) Savaresi, A, 2013. Chapter 2. The International Human Rights Law Implications of the Nagoya Protocol, 2010 NAGOYA PROTOCOL ON ACCESS AND BENEFIT-SHARING IN PERSPECTIVE: IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERNATIONAL LAW AND IMPLEMENTATION CHALLENGES, 1: 53−81. WOS:000338877200003

250) Schacht, H, 2014. The Recent EC Draft Concerning the Nagoya Protocol: Challenges for the Industry with a Special Regard to the Pharmaceutical Sector, BIOTECHNOLOGY LAW REPORT, 33: 115−119. DOI: 10.1089/blr.2014.9992. WOS:000337915900006

251) Schindel, DE; Du Plessis, P, 2014. Reap the benefits of the Nagoya Protocol, NATURE, 515: 37−37. DOI: 10.1038/515037a. WOS:000344187500018

252) Schindel, DE; Bubela, T; Rosenthal, J; Castle, D; du Plessis, P; Bye, R, 2015. The New Age of the Nagoya Protocol, NATURE CONSERVATION-BULGARIA, : 43−56. DOI: 10.3897/natureconservation.12.5412. WOS:000361405100003

253) Schoenberg, PL, 2009. A Polarizing Dilemma: Assessing Potential Regulatory Gap-Filling Measures for Arctic and Antarctic Marine Genetic Resource Access and Benefit Sharing, CORNELL INTERNATIONAL LAW JOURNAL, 42: 271−299. WOS:000272508600006

254) Schroeder, D; Chennells, R; Louw, C; Snyders, L; Hodges, T, 2020. The Rooibos Benefit Sharing Agreement-Breaking New Ground with Respect, Honesty, Fairness, and Care, CAMBRIDGE QUARTERLY OF HEALTHCARE ETHICS, 29: 285−301. DOI: 10.1017/S0963180119001075. WOS:000524929100012

255) Schulz, T; Hufty, M; Tschopp, M, 2017. Small and smart: the role of Switzerland in the Cartagena and Nagoya protocols negotiations, INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL AGREEMENTS-POLITICS LAW AND ECONOMICS, 17: 553−571. DOI: 10.1007/s10784-016-9334-9. WOS:000404993800006

256) Segger, MCC; Phillips, FK, 2015. Indigenous traditional knowledge for sustainable development: the biodiversity convention and plant treaty regimes, JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 20: 430−437. DOI: 10.1007/s10310-015-0498-x. WOS:000360863200003

257) Seifert, H; Weber, M; Glockner, FO; Kostadinov, I, 2020. An open-source GIS-enabled lookup service for Nagoya Protocol party information, DATABASE-THE JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL DATABASES AND CURATION, : 1−6. DOI: 10.1093/database/baaa014. WOS:000527706800001

258) Seiler, A; Dutfield, G, 2002. Regulating access and benefit sharing, BIOTECHNOLOGY AND DEVELOPMENT MONITOR, : 2−7. WOS:000175515000002

259) Siebenhuner, B; Suplie, J, 2005. Implementing the access and benefit-sharing provisions of the CBD: A case for institutional learning, ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 53: 507−522. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.10.012. WOS:000230162400006

260) Siebenhuner, B; Dedeurwaerdere, T; Brousseau, E, 2005. Introduction and overview to the special issue on biodiversity conservation, access and benefit-sharing and traditional knowledge, ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 53: 439−444. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.12.012. WOS:000230162400001

261) Sikor, T; Martin, A; Fisher, J; He, J, 2014. Toward an Empirical Analysis of Justice in Ecosystem Governance, CONSERVATION LETTERS, 7: 524−532. DOI: 10.1111/conl.12142. WOS:000346914400004

262) Silvestri, LC, 2017. Nagoya Protocol: Challenges Arising from a Complex, Ambiguous and Controversial Text, ANUARIO MEXICANO DE DERECHO INTERNACIONAL, 17: 697−716. WOS:000435609700020

263) Silvestri, L, 2017. What to consider and why when developing access and benefit-sharing regimes?, AUGMDOMUS, 9: 1−16. WOS:000502824900001

264) Silvestri, L; Sosa, A; Mc Kay, F; Vitorino, MD; Hill, M; Zachariades, C; Hight, S; Weyl, P; Smith, D; Djeddour, D; Mason, PG, 2020. Implementation of access and benefit-sharing measures has consequences for classical biological control of weeds, BIOCONTROL, 65: 125−141. DOI: 10.1007/s10526-019-09988-4. WOS:000520211100001

265) Sirakaya, A, 2019. Balanced Options for Access and Benefit-Sharing: Stakeholder Insights on Provider Country Legislation, FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 10: −. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01175. WOS:000497561100001

266) Sirakaya, A, 2020. A balanced ABS system: Stakeholder perception on ABS goals, SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, : −. DOI: 10.1002/sd.2040. WOS:000508895600001

267) Skirycz, A; Kierszniowska, S; Meret, M; Willmitzer, L; Tzotzos, G, 2016. Medicinal Bioprospecting of the Amazon Rainforest: A Modern Eldorado ?, TRENDS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY, 34: 781−790. DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.03.006. WOS:000384856500004

268) Smith, D; Buddie, AG; Goss, RJM; Overmann, J; Lepleux, C; Bronstrup, M; Kloaregs, B; Meiners, T; Brennecke, P; Ianora, A; Bouget, FY; Gribbon, P; Pina, M, 2019. Discovery pipelines for marine resources: an ocean of opportunity for biotechnology?, WORLD JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY & BIOTECHNOLOGY, 35: −. DOI: 10.1007/s11274-019-2685-y. WOS:000474497900004

269) Smith, D; Ryan, M, 2019. International postal, quarantine and safety regulations, MICROBIOLOGY AUSTRALIA, 40: 117−120. DOI: 10.1071/MA19032. WOS:000489065800008

270) Smith, D, 2017. Practical and Implementable Mechanisms for Compliance with the Nagoya Protocol: Access and Benefit Sharing, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 5TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF ARTHROPODS, : 67−70. WOS:000461868100020

271) Smith, D; da Silva, M; Jackson, J; Lyal, C, 2017. Explanation of the Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit Sharing and its implication for microbiology, MICROBIOLOGY-SGM, 163: 289−296. DOI: 10.1099/mic.0.000425. WOS:000400276500001

272) Smith, D; Hinz, H; Mulema, J; Weyl, P; Ryan, MJ, 2018. Biological control and the Nagoya Protocol on access and benefit sharing−a case of effective due diligence, BIOCONTROL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 28: 914−926. DOI: 10.1080/09583157.2018.1460317. WOS:000446576200002

273) Smyth, SJ; Macall, DM; Phillips, PWB; de Beer, J, 2020. Implications of biological information digitization: Access and benefit sharing of plant genetic resources, JOURNAL OF WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, 23: 267−287. DOI: 10.1111/jwip.12151. WOS:000520268300001

274) Snyder, S, 2011. Protecting Biological Diversity: The Effectiveness of Access and Benefit-sharing Regimes, GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 11: 156−158. DOI: 10.1162/GLEP_r_00075. WOS:000293040500015

275) Soares, J, 2011. The Nagoya Protocol and Natural Product-Based Research, ACS CHEMICAL BIOLOGY, 6: 289−289. DOI: 10.1021/cb200089w. WOS:000289455400001

276) Song, MJ; Kim, H; Heldenbrand, B; Jeon, J; Lee, S, 2013. Ethnopharmacological survey of medicinal plants in Jeju Island, Korea, JOURNAL OF ETHNOBIOLOGY AND ETHNOMEDICINE, 9: −. DOI: 10.1186/1746-4269-9-48. WOS:000321930900001


278) Spellerberg, B, 2017. Current development of the German Gene Bank for Ornamental Plants, ZWEITES SYMPOSIUM ZIERPFLANZENZUCHTUNG, 2017, 457: 15−17. DOI: 10.5073/jka.2017.457.001. WOS:000414274800001

279) Sreedharan, SK, 2010. Bridging the Time and Tide-Traditional Knowledge in the 21(st) Century, JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS, 15: 146−150. WOS:000277069500005

280) Srinivas, KR, 2017. Regimes in Conflict? Controversies over Access and Benefit Sharing and Sharing of Virus Samples, EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RISK REGULATION, 8: 573−579. DOI: 10.1017/err.2017.47. WOS:000413168600006

281) Stangeland, T; Dhillion, SS; Reksten, H, 2008. Recognition and development of traditional medicine in Tanzania, JOURNAL OF ETHNOPHARMACOLOGY, 117: 290−299. DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2008.02.008. WOS:000256207700013


283) Strand, J; Thomsen, H; Jensen, JB; Marcussen, C; Nicolajsen, TB; Skriver, MB; Sogaard, IM; Ezaz, T; Purup, S; Callesen, H; Pertoldi, C, 2020. Biobanking in amphibian and reptilian conservation and management: opportunities and challenges, CONSERVATION GENETICS RESOURCES, : −. DOI: 10.1007/s12686-020-01142-y. WOS:000519502700001

284) Suiseeya, KRM, 2014. Negotiating the Nagoya Protocol: Indigenous Demands for Justice, GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 14: 102−. DOI: 10.1162/GLEP_a_00241. WOS:000340021100006

285) Sutherland, LA; Shepheard, ML, 2017. IMPLEMENTING ACCESS AND BENEFIT SHARING FOR SEED BANKING, ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN, 102: 386−396. DOI: 10.3417/D-16-00002A. WOS:000407683300022

286) Swenson, U; Munzinger, J, 2016. Five new species and a systematic synopsis of Pycnandra (Sapotaceae), the largest endemic genus in New Caledonia, AUSTRALIAN SYSTEMATIC BOTANY, 29: 1−40. DOI: 10.1071/SB16001. WOS:000380133200002

287) Sybesma, W; Rohde, C; Bardy, P; Pirnay, JP; Cooper, I; Caplin, J; Chanishvili, N; Coffey, A; De Vos, D; Scholz, AH; McCallin, S; Puschner, HM; Pantucek, R; Aminov, R; Doskar, J; Kurtboke, DI, 2018. Silk Route to the Acceptance and Re-Implementation of Bacteriophage Therapy-Part II, ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL, 7: −. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics7020035. WOS:000436484700009

288) Talaat, WIAW, 2013. Protection of the Associated Traditional Knowledge on Genetic Resources: Beyond the Nagoya Protocol, PSU-USM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES, 91: 673−678. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.468. WOS:000348252800074

289) Tamminen, S, 2015. Changing values of farm animal genomic resources. from historical breeds to the Nagoya Protocol, FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 6: −. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2015.00279. WOS:000366907600001

290) Tay, D, 2005. Ornamental plant genetic resources conservation and utilization in the Convention on Biological Diversity era, Proceedings of the Vth International Symposium on New Floricultural Crops, : 233−242. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2005.683.27. WOS:000231867400027

291) Teran, MY, 2016. The Nagoya Protocol and Indigenous Peoples, INTERNATIONAL INDIGENOUS POLICY JOURNAL, 7: −. DOI: 10.18584/iipj.2016.7.2.6. WOS:000383961600006

292) Thormann, I; Engels, JMM; Halewood, M, 2019. Are the old International Board for Plant Genetic Resources (IBPGR) base collections available through the Plant Treaty's multilateral system of access and benefit sharing? A review, GENETIC RESOURCES AND CROP EVOLUTION, 66: 291−310. DOI: 10.1007/s10722-018-0715-5. WOS:000457581200001

293) Timmermann, BN; Wachter, G; Valcic, S; Hutchinson, B; Casler, C; Henzel, J; Ram, S; Currim, F; Manak, R; Franzblau, S; Maiese, W; Galinis, D; Suarez, E; Fortunato, R; Saavedra, E; Bye, R; Mata, R; Montenegro, G, 1999. The Latin American ICBG: The first five years, PHARMACEUTICAL BIOLOGY, 37: 35−54. DOI: 10.1076/1388-0209(200010)37:SUP;1-W;FT035. WOS:000165402200004

294) Tindall, B. J., 2020. Clarification of access regulations to genetic resources that are subject to the sovereign rights of sovereign states and the deposit of nomenclatural types under the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY, 70: 317−320. DOI: 10.1099/ijsem.0.003754. WOS:000514419600045

295) Touroult, J; Pollet, M; Pascal, O, 2018. Overview of Mitaraka survey: research frame, study site and field protocols, ZOOSYSTEMA, 40: 327−365. DOI: 10.5252/zoosystema2018v40a13. WOS:000454155600001

296) Trommetter, M, 2005. Biodiversity and international stakes: A question of access, ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 53: 573−583. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.11.017. WOS:000230162400010

297) Tsioumani, E, 2018. Beyond access and benefit-sharing: Lessons from the law and governance of agricultural biodiversity, JOURNAL OF WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, 21: 106−122. DOI: 10.1111/jwip.12094. WOS:000436807300001

298) van de Wiel, CCM; Schaart, JG; Lotz, LAP; Smulders, MJM, 2017. New traits in crops produced by genome editing techniques based on deletions, PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGY REPORTS, 11: 1−8. DOI: 10.1007/s11816-017-0425-z. WOS:000397080700001

299) van Lenteren, JC, 2012. The state of commercial augmentative biological control: plenty of natural enemies, but a frustrating lack of uptake, BIOCONTROL, 57: 1−20. DOI: 10.1007/s10526-011-9395-1. WOS:000299327400001

300) van Lenteren, JC; Cock, MJW; Brodeur, J; Barratt, BIP; Bigler, F; Bolckmans, K; Haas, F; Mason, PG; Parra, JRP, 2011. Will the Convention on Biological Diversity put an end to biological control?, REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ENTOMOLOGIA, 55: 1−5. DOI: 10.1590/S0085-56262011000100001. WOS:000289592800001

301) van Niekerk, J; Wynberg, R, 2012. The trade in Pelargonium sidoides: Rural livelihood relief or bounty for the 'bio-buccaneers'?, DEVELOPMENT SOUTHERN AFRICA, 29: 530−547. DOI: 10.1080/0376835X.2012.715440. WOS:000308703700003

302) van Zonneveld, M; Loo, J; Maselli, S; Madrid, JJ; Echeverria, JL, 2018. Bridging molecular genetics and participatory research: how access and benefit-sharing stimulate interdisciplinary research for tropical biology and conservation, BIOTROPICA, 50: 178−186. DOI: 10.1111/btp.12515. WOS:000419881900019

303) Vanheusden, B; Van den Berghe, G, 2017. The Implementation of 'Access and Benefit-sharing' in Five EU Member States: The Achievements and Deficiencies of the Nagoya Protocol and the eu Regulation 511/2014, JOURNAL FOR EUROPEAN ENVIRONMENTAL & PLANNING LAW, 14: 7−40. DOI: 10.1163/18760104-01401003. WOS:000399983800002

304) Velho-Pereira, S; Kamat, NM, 2013. Actinobacteriological research in India, INDIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY, 51: 573−596. WOS:000322856500001

305) Venkataraman, K, 2009. India's Biodiversity Act 2002 and its role in conservation, TROPICAL ECOLOGY, 50: 23−30. WOS:000268913200004

306) Verkley, G; Stadler, M; Luangsa-ard, J; Crous, PW, 2015. HOW WILL THE NAGOYA PROTOCOL AFFECT OUR DAILY WORK?, IMA FUNGUS, 6: −. WOS:000209909000002


308) Visser, B, 2016. GPL 1: Why and how did the Nagoya Protocol evolve?, 6TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM BREEDING RESEARCH ON MEDICINAL AND AROMATIC PLANTS (BREEDMAP 6), 453: 97−97. DOI: 10.5073/jka.2016.453.032. WOS:000385324200032

309) Voigt-Hanssen, G, 2018. Current 'Light' and 'Heavy' Options for Benefit-sharing in the Context of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MARINE AND COASTAL LAW, 33: 683−705. DOI: 10.1163/15718085-12334012. WOS:000457322100002

310) Watanabe, ME, 2015. The Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit Sharing, BIOSCIENCE, 65: 543−550. DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biv056. WOS:000355779400003

311) Watanabe, M, 2015. The Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit Sharing (vol 65, pg 543, 2015), BIOSCIENCE, 65: 644−644. WOS:000357845600004

312) Welch, EW, 2012. Potential implications of the Nagoya Protocol for the livestock sector, JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BREEDING AND GENETICS, 129: 423−424. DOI: 10.1111/jbg.12013. WOS:000311054200001

313) Welch, EW; Shin, E; Long, J, 2013. Potential effects of the Nagoya Protocol on the exchange of non-plant genetic resources for scientific research: Actors, paths, and consequences, ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 86: 136−147. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.11.019. WOS:000317803500015

314) Wilke, M, 2013. Chapter 4. A Healthy Look at the Nagoya Protocol-Implications for Global Health Governance, 2010 NAGOYA PROTOCOL ON ACCESS AND BENEFIT-SHARING IN PERSPECTIVE: IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERNATIONAL LAW AND IMPLEMENTATION CHALLENGES, 1: 123−148. WOS:000338877200005

315) Willcox, M; Diallo, D; Sanogo, R; Giani, S; Graz, B; Falquet, J; Bodeker, G, 2015. Intellectual property rights, benefit-sharing and development of "improved traditional medicines": A new approach, JOURNAL OF ETHNOPHARMACOLOGY, 176: 281−285. DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2015.10.041. WOS:000367106600023

316) Williams, M, 2015. Global Governance of Genetic Resources: Access and Benefit Sharing after the Nagoya Protocol, GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 15: 187−190. DOI: 10.1162/GLEP_r_00320. WOS:000358733800012

317) Wilson, D; Keith, G; Harpal, B; Ram, S; Fabien, D; Agnieszka, W; Toru, T, 2017. Therapy through Social Medicine: Cultivating Connections and Inspiring Solutions for Healthy Living, AIMS MEDICAL SCIENCE, 4: 131−150. DOI: 10.3934/medsci.2017.2.131. WOS:000404475600001

318) Winge, T, 2016. Linking access and benefit-sharing for crop genetic resources to climate change adaptation, PLANT GENETIC RESOURCES-CHARACTERIZATION AND UTILIZATION, 14: 11−27. DOI: 10.1017/S1479262114001038. WOS:000369415100002

319) Wynberg, R; Laird, SA, 2018. Fast Science and Sluggish Policy: The Herculean Task of Regulating Biodiscovery, TRENDS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY, 36: 1−3. DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2017.09.002. WOS:000418534800001

320) Wynberg, R, 2017. Making sense of access and benefit sharing in the rooibos industry: Towards a holistic, just and sustainable framing, SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 110: 39−51. DOI: 10.1016/j.sajb.2016.09.015. WOS:000400533600004

321) Wynberg, R; Laird, S; van Niekerk, J; Kozanayi, W, 2015. Formalization of the Natural Product Trade in Southern Africa: Unintended Consequences and Policy Blurring in Biotrade and Bioprospecting, SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 28: 559−574. DOI: 10.1080/08941920.2015.1014604. WOS:000354104300007

322) Xiao, N; Ahagon, N; Kubo, Y; Morioka, H, 2018. Preparing for the new age of the Nagoya Protocol in scientific ocean drilling, SCIENTIFIC DRILLING, 24: 51−59. DOI: 10.5194/sd-24-51-2018. WOS:000447838900004

323) Yea, SJ; Jang, Y; Seong, B; Kim, C, 2015. Comparative analysis of web search trends between experts and public for medicinal herbs in Korea, JOURNAL OF ETHNOPHARMACOLOGY, 176: 463−468. DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2015.11.027. WOS:000367106600042

324) Yea, SJ; Seong, B; Jang, Y; Kim, C, 2016. A data mining approach to selecting herbs with similar efficacy: Targeted selection methods based on medical subject headings (MeSH), JOURNAL OF ETHNOPHARMACOLOGY, 182: 27−34. DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2016.02.007. WOS:000373411100004

325) Yea, SJ; Kim, C; Kim, I; Sung, B, 2014. Picking out herbs with analogous efficacy based on MeSH semantic similarity, 2014 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOINFORMATICS AND BIOMEDICINE (BIBM), : −. WOS:000377412300091

326) Young, TR, 2013. An International Cooperation Perspective on the Implementation of the Nagoya Protocol, 2010 NAGOYA PROTOCOL ON ACCESS AND BENEFIT-SHARING IN PERSPECTIVE: IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERNATIONAL LAW AND IMPLEMENTATION CHALLENGES, 1: 451−505. WOS:000338877200016

327) Yu, CX, 2020. Implications of the UNCLOS Marine Scientific Research Regime for the Current Negotiations on Access and Benefit Sharing of Marine Genetic Resources in Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction, OCEAN DEVELOPMENT AND INTERNATIONAL LAW, 51: 2−18. DOI: 10.1080/00908320.2019.1677018. WOS:000493532900001

328) Yurkov, A; Puschner, HM; Scholz, AH, 2019. DSMZ: the European Union's first Registered Collection under the Nagoya Protocol, MICROBIOLOGY AUSTRALIA, 40: 108−113. DOI: 10.1071/MA19030. WOS:000489065800006

329) Zainol, ZA; Amin, L; Akpoviri, F; Ramli, R, 2011. Biopiracy and states' sovereignty over their biological resources, AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY, 10: 12395−12408. WOS:000298540000004

330) Zheng, XO, 2019. Key legal challenges and opportunities in the implementation of the Nagoya Protocol: The case of China, REVIEW OF EUROPEAN COMPARATIVE & INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW, 28: 175−184. DOI: 10.1111/reel.12282. WOS:000474672300006

331) Zidorn, C, 2019. Bioprospecting of plant natural products in Schleswig-Holstein (Germany) I: chemodiversity of the Cichorieae tribe (Asteraceae) in Schleswig-Holstein, PHYTOCHEMISTRY REVIEWS, 18: 1223−1253. DOI: 10.1007/s11101-019-09609-z. WOS:000496695300013